Krüger and Company, Ltd v Moel Tryvan Ship Company, Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 04 July 1907 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1907] UKHL J0704-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
[1907] UKHL J0704-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel, as well on Wednesday the 15th, as on Thursday the 16th, days of May last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Kr�ger and Company, Limited, of 69 Mark Lane, in the City of London, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 26th of January 1907, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed case of the Moel Tryvan Ship Company, Limited, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and due consideration had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in the Court of Parliament of His Majesty the King assembled, That the said Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 26th day of January 1907, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed, and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House: And it is further Ordered, That the Appellants do pay, or cause to be paid, to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dawson Line Ltd v Aktiengesellschaft Adler für Chemische Industrie of Berlin
...and Co. v. DunnDID=ASPM 11 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 337 (1909) 101 L. T. Rep. 578 Kruger and Co. v. Moel Tryvan Ship CompanyDID=ASPM 10 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 465 97 L. T. Rep. 143 (1907) A. C. 272 Sheffield Corporation v. Barclay 93 L. T. Rep. 83 (1905) A. C. 392 Birmingham and District Land Company......
-
Coast Lines Ltd v Hudig & Veder Chartering N.v (Brandaris, Grangefield)
...On this account it has been held that the chaterers were under a duty to indemnify the shipowners; see Kruger & Co. Ltd. v. Moel Tryvan (1907) A. C. 272. This duty may be said to arise from the request of the charterers to the Master to sign the bills of lading. But I would prefer to put it......
-
The Okehampton
...by them in addition to those referred to above: Kruger and Co. v. Moel Tryvan and Co., 97 L. T. Rep. 143; 10 Asp. Mar. r,aw Cas. 465; (1907) A.C. 272; Herman v. Royal Exchange Shipping Company, Cab. & E. 413; Harrison v. Huddersfield Steamship Company, 10 Times L. Rep. 386; Reeves v. Capper......
-
Gearbulk Pool v. Seaboard Shipping, [2005] B.C.T.C. 1620 (SC)
...et al. v. Fast, [2002] B.C.T.C. 446; 1 B.C.L.R.(4th) 81; 2002 BCSC 446, refd to. [para. 29]. Kruger & Co. v. Moel Tryvan Ship Co., [1907] A.C. 272; 76 L.J.K.B. 985 (H.L.), consd. [para. Triad Shipping Co. v. Steller Chartering and Brokerage Inc., [1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 227 (C.A.), consd.......