Munaf Ahmed Zinga Mukundan Pillai v R
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lady Justice Rafferty |
| Judgment Date | 07 November 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] EWCA Crim 2357 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 20114174 C2 & 20114218 C2 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 07 November 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
R (on the application of Mills) v Sussex Police
...(Admin) para. 89 and R (on the application of Goode) v The Crown Court at Nottingham [2013] EWHC 1726 (Admin) para.38; and Zinga v R [2012] EWCA Crim 2357 paras.31–32. If this is indeed the appropriate legal test, then since I cannot say that the warrant would not have been issued if there......
-
R v Zinga
...had found there was no bad faith on the part of Virgin or the police. The appeal against conviction was dismissed on 7 November 2012: [2012] EWCA Crim 2357. 5 Prior to the hearing of the appeal, Virgin began confiscation proceedings under the provisions of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ( P......
-
R (Virgin Media Ltd) v Munaf Ahmed Zinga
...experience, competent counsel at the criminal Bar do master difficult areas of science for the purposes of criminal prosecutions; DNA[2012] EWCA Crim 2357. As a result of the conviction Virgin applied for an order that their costs be paid from Central Funds under s.17 of the Prosecution of ......
-
R v Ortmann
...case was not the worst form of conspiracy to defraud, and adopted an end sentence of four years’ imprisonment. 44 R v Zinga [2012] EWCA Crim 2357. [88] In R v Taylor, Mr Taylor was charged with conspiracy to defraud Virgin being the guiding and controlling mind in a scheme to provide unauth......