Nanwa Gold Mines Ltd, Re. Ballantyne v Nanwa Gold Mines Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1955 |
Year | 1955 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
86 cases
-
Quistclose Investments Ltd v Rolls Razor Ltd ((in Liquidation))
...purpose of obtaining an allotment of shares (see Moseley v. Cressey's Co. 1865 L.R. 1 Eq. 405; Stewart v. Austin L.R. 3 Eq. 299; The Nanwa Gold Mines Ltd. [1955] 1 W.L.R. 1080). I do not think it necessary to examine these cases in detail, nor to comment on them, for I am satisfied that ......
-
Kingate Global Fund Ltd and Kingate Euro Fund Ltd v Bank of Bermuda Ltd, Knightsbridge (USD) Fund Ltde, Fortis Bank (Nederland) NV and Standard Chartered Bank
...to in the judgment: Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 Barclays Bank v Quistclose Investments Ltd [1970] AC 567 In re Nanwa Gold Mines [1955] 1 WLR 1080 Moseley v Cressey's Company (1865) LR 1 Eq 465 Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164 Stewart v Austin (1866) LR 3 Eq 299 In re Fada (Aus......
-
Hinckley Singapore Trading Pte Ltd v Sogo Department Stores (S) Pte Ltd (under judicial management)
...the maintenance of a separate account by the agent is crucial to constituting the money as trust money: see In Re Nanwa Gold Mines Ltd [1955] 1 WLR 1080 and In re Kayford Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 279. Here we are reminded of the words of Slade J in In re Bond Worth Ltd [1980] Ch 228 at 261:- "… whe......
-
Tito v Waddell (No. 2); Tito v Attorney General; Ocean Island (No. 2)
...(1794) 2 Ves.Jun. 317. Mitford v. Reynolds (1842) 1 Ph. 185. Moggridge v. Thackwell (1803) 7 Ves. 36. Nanwa Gold Mines Ltd., In re [1955] 1 W.L.R. 1080; [1955] 3 All E.R. 219. Nissan v. Attorney-General [1970] A.C. 179; [1969] 2 W.L.R. 926; [1969] 1 All E.R. 629, H.L.(E.). Nocton v. Lord As......
Request a trial to view additional results