Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse Company, Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date14 March 1899
Judgment citation (vLex)[1899] UKHL J0314-2
CourtHouse of Lords
Date14 March 1899
Powell
and
Kempton Park Racecourse Company, Limited.

[1899] UKHL J0314-2

House of Lords

1

After hearing Counsel, as well on Thursday the 5th as Friday the 6th and Tuesday the 17th days of May 1898, upon the Petition and Appeal of Charles Edward Powell, of Salcombe House, Half Moon Lane, Herne Hill, in the county of Surrey, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 5th of July 1897, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioner might have such other relief in the premises, as to Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the Kempton Park Racecourse Company, Limited, lodged in answer to the said Appeal: And due consideration being had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:

2

It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 5th day of July 1897, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed, and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House: And it is further Ordered, That the Appellant do pay, or cause to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • The King (Martin) v Mahony
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 30 June 1910
    ... ... The decision of the House of Lords, in Powell v. The Kempton Park Racecourse Company ( 5 ), shows ... ...
  • JI MacWilliam Company Inc. v Mediterranean Shipping Company Sa (the Rafaela S)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 February 2005
    ...in the preamble. The preamble cannot, therefore, be used to qualify or cut down the enactment: Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse Co Ltd [1899] AC 143, 157 per Earl of Halsbury 67 It was in any event necessary for the 1855 Act to apply to consignees as well as to endorsees if many of the prob......
  • R v Schildkamp
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 27 November 1969
    ... ... with a number of offences in connection with a company of which he was a member, namely, Fiesta Tours, Ltd. One of ... which were cordially approved by Lord Davey in Powell v. Kempton Park Racecourse Co. Ltd. On the other hand, it ... ...
  • Attorney General v Prince Ernest Augustus of Hanover
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 5 December 1956
    ...Davey in Powell v. Kempton Park Racecourse Company Powell v. Kempton Park Racecourse Company Powell v. Kempton Park Racecourse Company (1899) A.C. 143. On the other hand, it must often be difficult to say that any terms are clear and unambiguous until they have been studied in their context......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Race Power — Its Replacement and Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 40-3, September 2012
    • 1 September 2012
    ...explain it, 'it cannot control the enacting part, which may, and often does, go beyond the preamble'; Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse Co [1899] AC 143, 157 where the Earl of Halsbury stated that 'if an enactment is itself clear and unambiguous, no preamble can qualify or cut down the enact......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT