R (G) v S and S
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Treacy |
| Judgment Date | 14 December 2017 |
| Neutral Citation | [2017] EWCA Crim 2119 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 14 December 2017 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 2017/3803/C3 AND 2017/3865/C3 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Asif v Ditta and another
...staying the prosecution, which had been used for private tactical and oppressive reasons (post, paras 75, 79, 81, 94, 147).R (G) v S [2017] EWCA Crim 2119, CA applied.(2) Allowing the applications for costs against the prosecutor and the third party but dismissing the application against th......
-
Seyed Kamaleddin Nejati Gilani v Mohammed Johngir Saddiq (1)
...by other means.” 6 HHJ Thomas QC accepted that argument and directed a stay, but his decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal ( [2017] EWCA Crim 2119) which concluded that this was not a decision that the judge could reasonably have come to. The application to dismiss the charges for......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Private Prosecutions: A Blurred Line Between Recovery Of Damages And Public Justice?
...is 'oblique', i.e. so dominant and so unrelated to the criminal proceedings that it renders them an abuse of process: R (G) v S and S [2017] EWCA Crim 2119; is able, even in the event of an acquittal, to recover investigation and legal costs reasonably incurred from central funds (i.e. publ......