R (MS (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | Lord Kerr,Lady Hale,Lord Lloyd-Jones,Lord Briggs,Lady Black |
Judgment Date | 18 March 2020 |
Neutral Citation | [2020] UKSC 9 |
Date | 18 March 2020 |
Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
-
Elena Andreea Grecu v Gorj County Court (Romania)
...Judge's irrationality in refusing to accept the Appellant had been subject to domestic violence. However, in MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] 1 WLR 1373 the Court indicated that, in the context of immigration, the First-Tier Tribunal was better placed than ......
-
The King on the Application of FH v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...para 30). An investigative deficiency would be the responsibility of the police and CPS rather than the defendant ( MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 9, [2020] 1 WLR 1373, para 35). I am therefore unpersuaded by Ms Braganza's contention that, in establ......
-
Shamima Begum v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
...must now be given to the investigative duty and then the protective duty.” 35 SIAC noted the contrast with MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 9, [2020] 1 WLR 1373, where the exercise of the executive power of removal entailed a violation of ECHR Article......
-
Royal County Down Golf Club
...mind when legislating in the wide terms of s83. [42] Mr Harvey also relies on MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 9, [2020] 1 WLR 1373 (“MS (Pakistan)”), especially at [12] to [14]. Although in the different context of immigration law, Mr Harvey submitted ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Abuse of Process and the Modern Slavery Act 2015: R v DS [2020] EWCA Crim 285
...ECHR art 4 crea tes a positive obligation on the state toinvestigate allegations of human trafficking (MS (Pakistan) v Home Secretary [2020] UKSC 9). If theprosecutor fails to consider whether a defendant is a VOT, or unreasonably rejects such a claim, thatwould appear to be a violation of ......