R v Adams

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeLORD JUSTICE CUMMING-BRUCE
Judgment Date02 November 1979
Judgment citation (vLex)[1979] EWCA Crim J1102-6
Docket NumberNo. 4816/C/78
Date02 November 1979

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Northern Construction Ltd v Attorney General
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 31 July 2002
    ...accepted facts relevant to society in Trinidad and Tobago. In this regard, see the majority opinions of the Supreme Court of Canada in R v. RDS (1997) 3 S.C.R. 484. For example, as per, La Forest, L’ Henreux-Dube’, Gonthier and Mc Lachlin, JJ.: ‘Judicial inquiry into context provides the re......
  • The Queen v Craig Cant
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 25 May 2001
    ...v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 159; A'Beckett v Commissioner of Taxation (1959) 104 CLR 508; Wrotesley v Adams (1558) 1 Plowd 187 [ 75 ER 287]; R v Adams [1980] 1 All ER 473; Larsson v Commissioner of Police (NSW) (1988) 40 A Crim R 301, referred to Police Administration Act 1978 (NT), s 117, ......
  • Attorney General's Reference (Nos. 17 and 18 of 1992); Thomason (William) and Douglas (Martin)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date