R v B (Kenneth James)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE DYSON |
| Judgment Date | 23 October 2003 |
| Neutral Citation | [2003] EWCA Crim 3080 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | 1No. 2002/03715/B3 |
| Date | 23 October 2003 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
R v Beckles (Keith Anderson)
...from this section." 6 Section 34 was recently, justifiably, described by Dyson L.J. in R. v. B. (K. J.) The Times, December 15, 2003; [2003] EWCA Crim 3080, as "a notorious minefield" [paragraph 20 of transcript]. In R v Brizzalari, The Times, March 3, 2004; [2004] EWCA Crim 310, the Cour......
-
R v Robert Webber, Paul Ashton, Paul Steven Lyons
...is no room for the inference if that matter is agreed to be true. This approach was followed by the Court of Appeal, correctly, in R v Kenneth James B ( 23 October 2003, 29 A section 34 direction given by the trial judge in R v Hearne and Coleman (Court of Appeal, 4 May 2000, unreported) wa......
-
R v John Austin Chivers
...the inference if that matter is agreed to be true. This approach was followed by the Court of Appeal correctly in R v Kenneth Jones [2003] EWCA Crim 3080." 44 In his conclusion, Lord Bingham said, at paragraph 33: "Since the object of section 34 is to bring the law back into line with commo......
-
R v Gareth Davies and Matthew Jonathan Dove
...of the Judge's ruling that such evidence be admitted was one of prejudice to Dove or as indicating propensity on his part: Mr Pardoe citing R v B 1997 2 Cr. App Rep 88. Further, if it was the case that the evidence relating to the Beretta gun should not have been admitted then, so it was su......
3 books & journal articles
-
Exemplum Habemus: Reflections on the Judicial Studies Board's Specimen Directions
...precisely to follow adirection recommended by the Judicial Studies Board. But Judicial Studies51 [2002] EWCA Crim 2802 at [25]. In B [2003] EWCA Crim 3080 at [17], DysonLJ stressed that, had the trial judge attempted to employ the appropriatespecimen direction instead of referring airily to......
-
The challenge of the ECHR
...E.H.R.R. 162. 24 Murray v. United Kingdom (1996) 22 E.H.R.R. 29. 25 Telfner v. Austria (2002) 34 E.H.R.R. 207. 26 R. v. B (K. J.) [2003] E.W.C.A. Crim. 3080. 2007] The Challenge of the ECHR 91 his/her solicitor’s advice but because he or she had no satisfactory evidence to give. These and s......
-
Tinkering with the right to silence: the Evidence Amendment (Evidence of Silence) Act 2013 (NSW).
...145. (58) Birch, above n 57, 787. (59) Ibid 788. (60) Leng, above n 43,241. (61) Ibid 243. (62) Hamer et al, above n 25,9-10. (63) [2003] EWCA Crim 3080 (23 October 2003) [20] (Dyson (64) [2004] EWCA Crim 310 (19 February 2004) [57]. (65) Ibid. (66) All major stakeholders within the NSW cri......