R v Central Criminal Court, ex parte Godwin and Crook
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | LORD JUSTICE GLIDEWELL |
Judgment Date | 29 July 1994 |
Judgment citation (vLex) | [1994] EWCA Crim J0729-18 |
Docket Number | No. 94/1519/S2 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Date | 29 July 1994 |
To continue reading
Request your trial5 cases
-
Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication)
...by other interests, such as the statutory power to prohibit identification of child defendants and child victims. In Ex parte Crook [1995] 1 WLR 139, the criminal court trying parents for the manslaughter of one child and cruelty to three others had made an order under section 39 prohibiti......
-
R v Charlie Pearce – Ruling On Lifting Of Press Restrictions
...of criminal proceedings against the desirability of not causing harm to a child concerned with the proceedings” (Ex parte Crook [1995] 1 WLR 139). SUBMISSIONS Press Submissions 44. On 5th November 2017, I received a written application from the Press Association made by its Midlands Corresp......
-
R A v Lowestoft Magistrates' Court Crown Prosecution Service and Another (Interested Parties)
...the practical reach of the prohibition in the specific case. Godwin was applied by the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in R v The Central Criminal Court, ex parte ( Crook and Godwin unreported, 29 July 1994). 16 More recently, in re Trinity Mirror Plc and others [2008] EWCA Crim 50, the......
-
R v Central Criminal Court, ex parte S
...a distinction which Parliament clearly intended to preserve." 23 In R. v. The Central Criminal Court, ex parte Crook and Godwin (1995) 2 Cr.App.R. 212, the court was primarily concerned with what representations a judge was entitled to hear before making a direction under 24 s. 39. But Glid......
Request a trial to view additional results