R v Christopher Friel
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Gross |
| Judgment Date | 11 December 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] EWCA Crim 2871 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No: 2011/5892/C1 |
| Date | 11 December 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Bennett v R
...12 [1977] 1 QB 224. 13 Supra (n10), p. 1064/5 14 [2017] HCJAC 18. 15 2017 HCJAC 17; 2017 SCL 455. 16 [2012] EWCA Crim 1509, [28]. 17 [2012] EWCA Crim 2871. 18 R v Bradshaw [2017] 1 SCR 865, R v Khelawon [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787, R v Youvarajah [2013] 2 S.C.R. 720. See also, for Australia, Cros......
-
Japhet Bennet v The Queen
...the risks of unreliability and (3) the extent to which the reliability of the evidence can safely be tested and assessed by the jury. [2012] EWCA Crim 2871 23 The requirement that the jury must have sufficient tools to test and assess the hearsay evidence also figures prominently in the Ca......
-
The State v Nathaniel Augustine, otherwise called Kevin Dass
...24 (2000) 60 WIR 390, 402 25 R v Riat [2012] EWCA Crim 1509, [2013] 1 Cr. App. R. 2), [2013] 1 All E.R. 349 [17]. 26 Cf R v Friel [2012] EWCA Crim 2871, [26], 27 Neill v North Antrim Magistrates' Court [1992] 1 W.L.R. 1220, 1230; Matthews (Charles) v The State (2000) 60 WIR 390, 402; ......
-
R v Shelton Harvey, Emmanuel Laurencin, Yasemin Tutar and Levi Defreitas
...prosecution that wishes to put in the hearsay evidence and if it is the defence, they too must undertake proper checks. 52 In R v Friel [2012] EWCA Crim 2871, Gross LJ observed: 29. It is plain to us, therefore, that hearsay of any description is not to be nodded through or adduced as a mat......
Get Started for Free