R v Clark
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE GAGE |
| Judgment Date | 03 February 2006 |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] EWCA Crim 231 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No: 200500091/B3 |
| Date | 03 February 2006 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Stephen Hamilton v The Queen
...He considered a number of authorities including R v. Turner [1974] 60 Cr.App.R. (S) 80, R v. Snell and Wilson [2006] EWCA Crim 1404, R v. Nigel Clark [2006] EWCA Crim 231, R v. Richard W [2003] EWCA Crim 3490 and R v. Bernard V [2003] EWCA Crim 3917. He noted that Dr Boakes was involved in ......
- R v Phillip Coates
-
Winston Chanson v The Crown
...of the truth or otherwise of the complaints of sexual abuse being made. But if authority for that proposition is required it can be found in R v ER [2010] EWCA Crim 2522, and R v Clarke [2006] EWCA Crim 231 [30]. 13 In ER this Court ruled that expert evidence as to the effect of the passage......
4 books & journal articles
-
Noticeboard
...LQR 147). Another is to permit the jury to hear expert evidence aboutthe possible effect of hypnotherapy on recollection.In RvClark [2006] EWCA Crim 231 the appellant was convicted of sexual offencesagainst his daughter (K) when she was aged 10 to 15 and her school friend (A) whenaged 10 to......
-
Noticeboard
...LQR 147). Another is to permit the jury to hear expert evidence aboutthe possible effect of hypnotherapy on recollection.In RvClark [2006] EWCA Crim 231 the appellant was convicted of sexual offencesagainst his daughter (K) when she was aged 10 to 15 and her school friend (A) whenaged 10 to......
-
Noticeboard
...Of course,there will be no pre-hypnosis statement if the offence is first mentioned duringtherapeutic hypnosis (as in RvClark [2006] EWCA Crim 231). In such cases RvTrochym precludes a prosecution unless substantial independent evidence exists.Legislative fact evidence—Canada, Australia and......
-
From Theory into Practice: Introducing the Reference Class Problem
...federal bench, in which Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyerdescribes him—quoting the National Law Journal—as ‘a living legend’).32 [2006] EWCA Crim 231.33 Such questions invite further differentiation by reference class: Which specialist literature(s)?According to whose interpretation? etc......