R v Clark

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeLORD JUSTICE GAGE
Judgment Date03 February 2006
Neutral Citation[2006] EWCA Crim 231
Docket NumberNo: 200500091/B3
Date03 February 2006

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • R v Phillip Coates
    • United Kingdom
    • Courts-Martial Appeal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Stephen Hamilton v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 22 July 2014
    ...a number of authorities including R v. Turner [1974] 60 Cr.App.R. (S) 80, R v. Snell and Wilson [2006] EWCA Crim 1404, R v. Nigel Clark [2006] EWCA Crim 231, R v. Richard W [2003] EWCA Crim 3490 and R v. Bernard V [2003] EWCA Crim 3917. He noted that Dr Boakes was involved in the cases of R......
  • Winston Chanson v The Crown
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 6 July 2012
    ...sexual abuse being made. But if authority for that proposition is required it can be found in R v ER [2010] EWCA Crim 2522, and R v Clarke [2006] EWCA Crim 231 [30]. 13 In ER this Court ruled that expert evidence as to the effect of the passage of time upon issues of sexual abuse should not......
3 books & journal articles
  • Noticeboard
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 10-3, July 2006
    • 1 July 2006
    ...LQR 147). Another is to permit the jury to hear expert evidence aboutthe possible effect of hypnotherapy on recollection.In RvClark [2006] EWCA Crim 231 the appellant was convicted of sexual offencesagainst his daughter (K) when she was aged 10 to 15 and her school friend (A) whenaged 10 to......
  • Noticeboard
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 10-3, July 2006
    • 1 July 2006
    ...LQR 147). Another is to permit the jury to hear expert evidence aboutthe possible effect of hypnotherapy on recollection.In RvClark [2006] EWCA Crim 231 the appellant was convicted of sexual offencesagainst his daughter (K) when she was aged 10 to 15 and her school friend (A) whenaged 10 to......
  • Noticeboard
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 11-3, July 2007
    • 1 July 2007
    ...Of course,there will be no pre-hypnosis statement if the offence is first mentioned duringtherapeutic hypnosis (as in RvClark [2006] EWCA Crim 231). In such cases RvTrochym precludes a prosecution unless substantial independent evidence exists.Legislative fact evidence—Canada, Australia and......