R v Clipston (Vincent)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | SIR CHRISTOPHER HOLLAND,MR JUSTICE IRWIN,LORD JUSTICE HOOPER,Lord Justice Gross |
| Judgment Date | 04 March 2011 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] EWCA Crim 569,[2011] EWCA Crim 446,[2010] EWCA Crim 1290 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 200905904B2,No: 200905904 B2,No: 2007/3811/A8 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 04 March 2011 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
R v Kenny
...funds for satisfaction of the confiscation order – and confiscation proceeding are themselves broadly criminal in nature: see, R v Clipston (Vincent) [2011] EWCA Crim 446; [2011] 2 Crim App R(S) 101. 27 (2) Authority: Perverting the course of justice is a common law offence. It is committed......
-
OB v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office
...proceedings under POCA, whereas they do not apply to confiscation proceedings which are to be regarded as criminal in nature: see R v Vincent Clipston [2011] EWCA Crim 446; [2011] 2 Cr App R(S) 101, esp. at [50]. While we acknowledge the somewhat ambiguous nature of the wording in s.46(2) (......
-
R v Ahmad and another
...infringe the Convention – see especially para 49. 8In R v Silcock and Levin [2004] EWCA Crim 408; [2004] 2 Cr App R (S) 61, para 60 and R v Clipston [2011] EWCA Crim 446; [2011] 2 Cr App R (S) 101, paras 57–60, the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division explained that the character of a confi......
-
Shokat Zuman v R
...confiscation proceedings under POCA are an extension of the sentencing hearing and are therefore criminal in nature: see Clipston [2011] EWCA Crim 446 at [45]. Clipston provides a useful overview of the principles relating to the admission of “evidence” for the purposes of confiscation pro......
Request a trial to view additional results