R v Flack (Perry)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Mr Justice Saunders |
| Judgment Date | 16 January 2013 |
| Neutral Citation | [2013] EWCA Crim 115 |
| Date | 16 January 2013 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No: 2012/5837/A6 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
The Director of Public Prosecutions v Jane Distill
...was held to be a "dwelling" even though it was for the time being unoccupied. In the light of the decisions of the Court of Appeal in R. v Flack [2013] EWCA Crim 115 and R. v Sticklen [2013] EWCA Crim 615, the question of whether a particular building was a "dwelling" for the purposes of th......
-
Hudson v Crown Prosecution Service
...must be "inhabited". 14 Such limited authority as there is, supports the meaning of "dwelling" being a question of fact – not law. In R v Flack [2013] EWCA Crim 115; [2013] 2 Cr App R (S), in an appeal against sentence following a plea of guilty, the Court held that the question whether the......
-
Bruce Chipunza v R
...think it likely that there have been very few such charges.9 The parties referred the judge to the decision of this court in R v Flack [2013] EWCA Crim 115; [2013] 2 Cr App R (S) 56. The defendant had pleaded guilty to burglary of a dwelling. Nonetheless it was his case that the building he......
-
Russell v The Crown Prosecution Service
...(rather than an immediate destruction order) was considered and dealt with in some detail by the Court of Appeal Criminal Division in Regina v Flack [2013] EWCA Crim 115. 35 The judgment of the court was given by Silber J, and he set out in paragraph 11 of the judgment the relevant principl......