R v O'Hare
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE SCOTT BAKER |
| Judgment Date | 07 September 2006 |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] EWCA Crim 2512 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 2005/04573/D1 |
| Date | 07 September 2006 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
West Midlands Probation Board v French
...within the term “order” as used in section 2 of the 1868 Act, in the light of the decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in R v Clarke [1969] 2 QB 91. In that case, Lord Parker CJ, giving the judgment of the court, stated (at page 97C – D) that the word “order” in section 2 of ......
-
R v Maxwell
...since otherwise the conditions laid down by Parliament in section 116 would be circumvented. As Scott Baker LJ said in O'Hare [2006] EWCA Crim 2512 at paragraph 30: “We think it important to point out that, as a matter of generality, section 114 cannot and should not be applied so as to re......
-
R v McLaughlin (Damien)
...the conditions laid down by Parliament in Section 116 (our Article 20) would be circumvented. As Scott Baker LJ said in R v O’Hare [2006] EWCA Crim 2512 at [30]: ‘We think it is important to point out that, as a matter of generality, Section 114 cannot and should not be applied so as to ren......
-
The Queen v Z
...since otherwise the conditions laid down by Parliament in section 116 would be circumvented. As Scott Baker LJ said in O' Hare [2006] EWCA Crim 2512 at paragraph 30: “We think it important to point out that, as a matter of generality, section 114 cannot and should not be applied so as to re......
Request a trial to view additional results