R v Iqbal (Khalid)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMR. JUSTICE CAULFIELD
Judgment Date22 February 1985
Judgment citation (vLex)[1985] EWCA Crim J0222-10
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Docket NumberNo. 3867/C2/84
Date22 February 1985

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • R v Dunham
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 19 October 1995
    ... ... The latter point is illustrated by Iqbal (1985) 7 Cr.App.R.(S.) 35, in which this Court held that total sentences of 30 months youth custody imposed upon a 16 year old could validly be ... ...
  • R v Daniels
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • 7 June 2005
    ... ... 43A simply did not apply to ‘ records … created for the purpose of the trial in which they were now being sought to be admitted ’: R -v- Iqbal [1990] 1 WLR 756 at 764E-F ... Iqbal was construing the English counterpart of section 43A(4) of the Bermuda 1905 Act, which provides ... ...
  • Liam Stuart O'Meara
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 8 April 1998
    ... ... There is no bar to the variation arising out of section 1B; Iqbal is authority for that. "Secondly, a sentence of 21 months is not barred by statue, whether section 53 or the Criminal Justice Act 1982 ... ...
1 books & journal articles
  • Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 50-1, February 1986
    • 1 February 1986
    ...fromthegeneral power conferred by the Act of 1971that"asentenceimposed...may be varied or rescinded"? In the present case, R. v.Iqbal (1985) 81Cr.App.R.145, the court, having surveyed thehistory ofthepower to vary sentence, concluded that the provisionsoftheActof 1971 being no morethanacont......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT