R v J & Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 23 July 2010 |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] EWCA Crim 1755 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 23 July 2010 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Misick and Others v The Queen (Turks and Caicos)
...of independence is that it ensures a public perception of impartiality: – see its treatment by Lamer CJ in the Canadian case of R v Lippé [1991] 2 SCR 114. But, as Lord Carswell pointed out in Kearney v HM Advocate [2005] UKPC D1; 2006 SC 1, paras 57–62, independence has a separate signif......
-
The Queen v Floyd Basil Hall, Jeffrey Christoval Hall, Melbourne Arthur Wilson, Clayton Stanfield Greene
...all, he argues, it is judicially recognised that juries follow the directions given by the judge upon the evidence that is laid before them: R v B [2007] E. M. L. R. Pretrial Publicity. 34 Learned counsel, referring to the case of R v West [1996] 2 Cr App R 37 asserts that pretrial publicit......
-
Rawiri Kiyomi Iti Omar Hamed Valerie Morse Moana Hemi Winitana Trudi Paraha Urs Peter Signer Emily Felicity Bailey Rangi Kemara Tuhoe Lambert v The Queen
...Bill of Rights) which protects the right to a trial by jury. The Judge said that argument was precluded by the decision of this Court in R v Wenzel4 and the Supreme Court's refusal to grant leave to appeal from that decision. 5 Winkelmann J accepted that the existence of a right to a trial ......
1 books & journal articles
-
The Prosecution of Organised Crime: Removing the Jury
...EWCA Crim 1035, [2010] 1 WLR 630 at [16].38 Ibid. at [18].39 R v Twomey [2009] EWCA Crim 1035, [2010] 1 WLR 630.40 R v J, S and M [2010] EWCA Crim 1755 at [7].41 KS v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1756.42 R v J, S and M [2010] EWCA Crim 1755 at [8].43 R v Twomey [2009] EWCA Crim 1035, [2010] 1 WLR 630......