R v Jones (James)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Leveson |
| Judgment Date | 29 April 2010 |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] EWCA Crim 925 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 2009/05657/C1 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 29 April 2010 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
R v Mia Moore Ben Peter Burrows
...she had never been a supplier or a runner before or since. It was on the basis of those facts that Moon was distinguished in R v. Jones [2010] 2 Cr App R 10 by Leveson LJ at para [15]. Jones concerned an undercover officer's test purchases from a shop of cannabis-growing equipment, together......
-
R the United States of America v Gypsy Nirvana
... ... As explained by Leveson LJ, as he was, in the case of R v Jones [2010] 2 Cr App R 10 at para 1: “The production of the controlled drug cannabis contravenes section 4(1)(a) of the Misuse of Drugs ... ...
-
R. v. Nguyen (T.T.),
...[para. 32]. R. v. Kenning, [2008] EWCA Crim 1534, consd. [para. 35]. R. v. Dang, [2014] EWCA Crim 348, consd. [para. 37]. R. v. Jones, [2010] EWCA Crim 925, consd. [para. Statutes Noticed: Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 21(1) [para. 47]; sect. 464 [para. 49]. Counsel: Kathleen H......
-
R v Leonard Wilson
...are well-known and we need not repeat them, only to refer to one of the leading recent cases on the subject R v Dillon [2010] EWCA Crim 1577, [2011] 2 Cr App R 10. 17 Here, we have the assistance of the prosecutor who submitted a response to the applicant's original grounds of appeal. That ......