R v Lisa Joy Loizou
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE KEENE,LORD JUSTICE HOOPER,Mr Justice Beatson,MR JUSTICE LEVESON |
| Judgment Date | 14 July 2006 |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] EWCA Crim 1719,[2006] EWCA Crim 204 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | Case No: 200503714 D1,No: 2005/3714/D1 |
| Date | 14 July 2006 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
R v Seaton (Oral)
...voluntarily opens up the topic of what he told his solicitor, since Wishart did not voluntarily do anything of the kind. 40 Loizou [2006] EWCA Crim 1719 was an example of the second type of Condron/ Bowden case, where the defendant had put in evidence not only the fact of legal advice to r......
-
The Queen v Muhammed Ahmed
...R v Derby Justices ex parte B [1996] A.C. 487, B v Auckland District Law Society [2003] UKPC 38, [2003] 2 A.C. 736 and R v Loizou [2006] EWCA Crim 1719 (unreported). However, there was little or no disagreement as to the principles involved and we do not think that anything is to be gained......
-
Re D (Care Proceedings: Legal Privilege)
...privacy and so proportionality demands the widest respect for confidentiality. Relying on paragraph 79 of Hooper L.J.'s judgment in R v Loizou [2006] EWCA Crim 1719 he submits that the judge's error is to fail to identify the "actual unfairness of the disclosure". 22 Miss Meyer submits that......
-
R v Teon Hall-Chung
...remain silent but the grounds upon which that advice had been given, waived legal professional privilege. 14 Similarly in R v Loizou [2006] EWCA Crim 1719 this court took the view that legal professional privilege had been waived where the defence had asked questions in-chief about the grou......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Court of Appeal
...and Public Order Act 1994, s. 34:Silence in Reliance on Legal Advice; Waiver of LegalProfessional PrivilegeR vLoizou (Lisa Joy) [2006] EWCA Crim 1719Appellant L was jointly tried with M, Q and G for transferring criminalproperty, £87,000 in cash, contrary to s. 327(1)(d) of the Proceeds ofC......
-
Court of Appeal
...was bound to follow these authorities, even if it thought there wasreason to doubt the line of authority. After Wishart came R vLoizou[2006] EWCA Crim 1719, where the court assumed, on the basis ofWishart that no waiver of privilege was involved if an accused called hissolicitor to rebut an......