R v Martin

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, CJ
Judgment Date25 July 2014
Neutral Citation[2014] EWCA Crim 1940
Docket NumberNo. 2013/05617/C5 & 2013/ 05656/C5
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date25 July 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • R v James Michael Lee
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 26 January 2017
    ...conclusion is reached by drawing inferences does not mean there is no evidence to be left to the jury. Further, the authority of R v Martin [2014] EWCA Crim 1940, confirms that a completed supply is not needed for this offence to be committed. 13 We entirely agree with the single judge's re......
  • R v Coker
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 28 February 2019
    ...that the Defence made stating the direction was wrong, submissions were made on behalf of the Crown that further to the case of Martin [2015] 1 WLR 588 (11) which said the term ‘supply’ is a broad term, an ‘offer of supply’ can be included in the broader term ‘being concerned in the supply......
  • R v Laskowski
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 1 January 2023
    ...judgment of the court: R v Hussain (Shabbir) [2010] EWCA Crim 970; [2011] QB 1; [2010] 3 WLR 808; [2010] 2 Cr App R 11, CA R v Martin (Dwain) [2014] EWCA Crim 1940; [2015] 1 WLR 588; [2015] 1 Cr App R 11, R v Prior [2004] EWCA Crim 1147; [2004] Crim LR 849, CA R v Sheppard [2010] EWCA Crim ......
  • R v Tyrone Anthony Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 15 December 2022
    ...the offence created by s.4(3)(b) were considered in R v Coker [2019] 2 Cr App R 10. At [28], Gross LJ stated: “Accordingly, applying Hughes, Martin and Abi-Khalil, the elements of the offence under section 4(3)(b) of the Act, of which the prosecution must make the jury sure, are: 1. that th......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT