R v Mattey ; R v Queeley

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE GLIDEWELL
Judgment Date13 October 1994
Judgment citation (vLex)[1994] EWCA Crim J1010-8
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date13 October 1994
Docket NumberNo. 93/6487/Z5-93/6488/Z5

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • R v Richards (Frank)
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 3 September 2009
    ...difference between the use of the provision by the prosecution and the defence is the standard of proof. The case of R v Mattey [1995] 2 Cr. App. R. 409 addresses the issue of the standard of proof. The Court there held that where the defence wishes to use the provision, the standard of pr......
  • Daimler Ag (Formerly Known As Mercedes-benz Ag) v Helge Herbert Leiduck Appointed By Order To Represent The Estate Of Herbert Heinz Horst Leiduck, Deceased And Another
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 2 December 2016
    ...(R v Ewing [1983] QB 1039) while the civil standard (balance of probabilities) applied to the evidence of the defence (R v Mattey [1995] 2 Cr App R 409).[16] The rationale appears to me to be that the burden of proving the competence of a witness (when the same is in issue) and therefore th......
  • Dpp v Jose Boo
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 January 1998
    ...outside the contents of the statement itself (see in that respect 20 R. v. Case [1991] CLR 192 followed in R. v. Mattey and Queeley [1995] 2 Cr.App.R 409 at page 412 D to F). 21 It is accepted that that the Respondent's evidence constituted some evidence that Mr Carlos Munoz existed and Mis......
3 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-4, November 2008
    • 1 November 2008
    .... . . . . . . .326R v Maqsud Ali [1966] 1 QB 688. . . . 17, 290, 291,292R vMason [2002] EWCACrim 385 . . . . . . . . . . 292R vMattey [1995] 2Cr App R409. . . . . . . . . . . . 281R vMatthey [2007] VSC398 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172R v Mawji [2003] EWCA Crim 3067. . . . 288, 294,296......
  • Human Trafficking, Victims’ Rights and Fair Trials
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 82-2, April 2018
    • 1 April 2018
    ...[2009] EWCA Crim 254; [2009] 2 Cr App R 8.115. Al-Khawaja vUK (2012) 54 EHRR 23.116. [2012] EWCA Crim 2564, [64].117. RvMattey [1995] 2 Cr App R 409; see also RvNkemayang [2005] EWCA Crim 1937.118. Namely Leeds, Kingston and Liverpool, where its extension to sexual offence and human traffic......
  • Authenticating ‘Things’ in English Law: Principles for Adducing Tangible Evidence in Common Law Jury Trials
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-4, November 2008
    • 1 November 2008
    ...Cf. RvSellick[2005] EWCA Crim 651 at [7]; RvRadak [1999] 1 Cr App R 187.74 Cf. RvBonny [2005] EWCA Crim 1937 at [11]; RvMattey [1995] 2 Cr App R 409.75 The unavailability of a prosecution witness need not be established beyond reasonable doubt inCanada: RvAdam [2006] BCSC 1430 at [25]–[26].......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT