R v R
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Judge | Lord Justice Dyson |
| Judgment Date | 29 February 2008 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] EWCA Crim 370 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 2007/06392/C5 |
| Date | 29 February 2008 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
R v L and Another
...misconceived. Such an expression does not appear anywhere in the Act: see R v Y [2008] EWCA Crim 10, at paragraph 20 and R v R [2008] EWCA Crim 370 at paragraph 24. This ruling undoubtedly related to the count on the indictment and is a proper subject for appeal under section 58. As it happ......
-
R v Arnold (Louise) ; R v LSA
...No 1786, which provisions are identical to those applicable in civilian courts under section 58(8) Criminal Justice Act 2003. In R v R [2008] EWCA Crim 370 the condition was conveniently dubbed 'the acquittal agreement' (see paragraph 19). 2 The defendant was charged with two offences contr......
-
R v Arnold (Louise) ; R v LSA
...which provisions are identical to those applicable in civilian courts under section 58(8) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. In R v R [2008] EWCA Crim 370 the condition was conveniently dubbed “the acquittal agreement”: see para 2 The defendant was charged with two offences contrary to the s......
-
R v T(N)
...agreement itself. 17 For the purposes of this judgment we have considered the decisions of this court in R v Clarke [2008] 1 Cr AR 33; R v R [2008] EWCA 370; R v H [2008] EWCA Crim 483; R v MT and MT [2009] EWCA Crim 668; CPS v C, M and H [2009] EWCA Crim 2614; R v T [2009] EWCA Crim 1947; ......
Get Started for Free