R v R, M & L

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Treacy
Judgment Date10 May 2013
Neutral Citation[2013] EWCA Crim 708
Docket NumberCase No: 201300960 C2 201300962 C2
Date10 May 2013
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • R v H
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 12 June 2014
    ...which made it proper to order a preparatory hearing." 23 Similar references can be found in R v Z [2009] EWCA (Crim) 2476, R v Lawrence [2014] 1 Cr App R 5 and R v Berry [2014] EWCA (Crim) 505. Although we understand why there might have been a degree of efficiency in there being an ability......
  • Jake Muldoon v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 18 March 2021
    ...R v Ibrahim [2010] EWCA Crim 1176 at [11] and R v Riat [2012] EWCA Crim 1509 at [20]). Furthermore, in Lawrence [2013] EWCA Crim 708; [2014] 1 Cr App R 5 (33), this court suggested that the reasons for refusal to give evidence at a retrial would have to be considered as carefully as in fe......
  • R v Dr Errol Cornish (First Defendant) Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust (Second Defendant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 16 October 2015
    ...written submissions to a number of authorities on this topic, including R v H [2007] 2 AC 270; R v I [2010] 1 WLR 1125; and R v R, M and L [2013] EWCA Crim 708. However, the modern law and practice seems to me to be neatly summarised by the Lord Chief Justice in R v Gary Quillan and others ......