R v Richard Dundon

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeThe Vice President
Judgment Date18 March 2004
Neutral Citation[2004] EWCA Crim 621
Docket NumberCase No: 200305369 C5
Date18 March 2004

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Ismail Abdurahman v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 17 December 2019
    ... ... procedure; second, where the evidence against the appellant was overwhelming: R v Horncastle [2010] 2 AC 373 , [11] (Lord Phillips); R v Dundon [2004] EWCA Crim 621 , [15] (Rose LJ). This case falls into neither category ... 89 As to the first, Mr King submitted that the ... ...
  • R v Bakish Alla Khan ; R v Lewthwaite
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 14 March 2008
    ...and impartiality in the tribunal, it would be possible to conclude that the conviction is safe” per Rose LJ, Vice-President in R v Dundon [2004] EWCA Crim 621. 9 It is important to distinguish between partiality towards the case of one of the parties and partiality towards a witness. Each c......
  • Public Prosecutor v Pang Chie Wei and other matters
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 1 November 2021
    ...at a naval court martial presided over by a judge advocate. It was held in two subsequent decisions (one of which was R v Dundon [2004] EWCA Crim 621 (“Dundon”)) that courts martial were incompatible with the right to a fair hearing, a right protected under Art 6(1) of the European Conventi......
  • Tsang Yiu Kai And Others v Insider Dealing Tribunal
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 18 December 2007
    ...to the Court of Appeal for an extension of time to seek leave to appeal because of the decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Dundon [2004] EWCA Crim 621, The Times, April 28, 2004, following a decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Grieves v United Kingdom [2004] 39 EHRR 7 “ … b......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Courts-Martial: Compatibility with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 68-3, June 2004
    • 1 June 2004
    ...fear that domestic courts may take issue withthe European Court of Human Rights, that has surely been laid to rest inR vDundon [2004] EWCA Crim 621, [2004] All ER (D) 364 (Mar) wherethe Courts-Martial Appeal Court, applying Grieves, allowed an appeal bya naval petty off‌icer from a convicti......