R v S(K)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 17 November 2009 |
Neutral Citation | [2009] EWCA Crim 2377 |
Docket Number | Case No: 2009/04170/B5 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Date | 17 November 2009 |
To continue reading
Request your trial3 cases
-
Ebanks v R
...R. v. Gough, [1993] A.C. 646; [1993] 2 W.L.R. 883; [1993] 2 All E.R. 724; (1993), 97 Cr. App. R. 188, considered. (6) R. v. S.(K.), [2010] 1 W.L.R. 2511; [2010] 1 All E.R. 1084; [2010] 1 Cr. App. R. 20; [2009] EWCA Crim 2377, distinguished. (7) R. v. Turnbull, [1977] Q.B. 224, [1976] 3 W.L.......
-
R (KS) v Northampton Crown Court and Another
...tampering. The Court of Appeal (The Lord Chief Justice presiding) were satisfied so that they were sure that jury tampering had occurred. ( R v KS [2009] EWCA Crim 2377). The court directed that HHJ Alexander QC could not himself continue with the trial, and remitted to the Presiding Judge ......
-
R v KS
...Flaux J was required to address the problem of trial by jury or trial by judge alone, are fully explained in the judgment of this court in R v KS [2009] EWCA Crim 2377. In very brief summary, this court upheld the decision of HH Judge Alexander QC at the defendant's trial that the jury sho......