R v SA and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeLord Justice Gross
Judgment Date15 February 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] EWCA Crim 144
Docket NumberCase No: 2018/03088/B1
Date15 February 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • R v Andrew Nathaniel Skeene
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 21 Enero 2025
    ...actually went about defrauding the intended victims of their money.” 46 Building on these authorities, the Court in R v SA and others [2019] EWCA Crim 144 at [69]–[72] provided a broad summary of relevant principles, including: i) (after referring to Stott) “The emphasis, it may be seen, i......
  • Re Secretary For Justice
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 28 Octubre 2022
    ...6 September 2021). [257] HKSAR v Chan Tin Cheung (Unrep., ESCC 2797/2020, 25 June 2022). [258] R v X Ltd [2014] 1 WLR 591. [259] R v SA [2019] 4 WLR 142. ...
  • Re Secretary For Justice
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 28 Octubre 2022
    ...6 September 2021). [257] HKSAR v Chan Tin Cheung (Unrep., ESCC 2797/2020, 25 June 2022). [258] R v X Ltd [2014] 1 WLR 591. [259] R v SA [2019] 4 WLR 142. ...
  • Re Secretary For Justice
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 28 Octubre 2022
    ...6 September 2021). [257] HKSAR v Chan Tin Cheung (Unrep., ESCC 2797/2020, 25 June 2022). [258] R v X Ltd [2014] 1 WLR 591. [259] R v SA [2019] 4 WLR 142. ...