R v Sakavickas (Rolandas); R v Reichwald (Stephen Howard)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Kennedy |
| Judgment Date | 03 November 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWCA Crim 2686 |
| Docket Number | Case No:2003/01218/B3 & 2003/01253/B3 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 03 November 2004 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
R v Ali (Liaquat)
... ... worded, in this respect, in the same way as in Sakavickas [2004] EWCA Crim 268 ; (2005) Crim LR 2005 , to which we ... 120 In Sakavickas he and Reichwald had been convicted of conspiracy to commit an offence ... ...
-
R v Saik
...is a fact necessary for the commission of the offence and section 1(2) applies to that fact. The contrary analysis in R v Sakavickas [2005] 1WLR 857, 863, para 17, was erroneous. 11 The genesis of this feature of the legislation lies in the ingredients of the common law offence of conspirac......
-
R v El-Kurd (No 2) ; R v K ; R v S ; R v X
...by this court: see R v. El Kurd [2001] Crim. L. R. 234; R v Rana Singh [2003] EWCA Crim 3712; and R v Sakavikas and Reichwald [2004] EWCA Crim. 2686. 4 In a number of substantive money laundering offences, including section 49 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 and sections 93A-D of the Crimi......
-
R v Ramzan
...origin sufficed for conspiracy where it was enough for the substantive offence. That had been held to be the case in Sakavickas [2004] EWCA Crim 2686; [2005] 1 WLR 857. 9 In Saik the House of Lords held that this was not so, upholding the earlier decision of this Court to similar effect in......
Request a trial to view additional results