R v Sam Hallam
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LADY JUSTICE HALLETT |
| Judgment Date | 17 May 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] EWCA Crim 1158 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 2011/04293/C5 |
| Date | 17 May 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
R (Hallam and Another) v Secretary of State for Justice
...the prosecution to support the identifying witnesses, namely the evidence as to false alibi”, had been “significantly undermined” ( [2012] EWCA Crim 1158, para 75). She went on (para 76): “… we are now satisfied that any confidence that the appellant had lied and/or asked Harrington to con......
-
Sam Hallam and Another v The Secretary of State for Justice
...was at the relevant time. 5 The prosecution did not seek to uphold the conviction or seek a retrial. In giving the judgment of the CACD, [2012] EWCA Crim 1158, Hallett LJ summarised the position: "[77] In our judgment the following summary encapsulates this appeal. The case against the appe......
-
R (on the application of Victor Nealon) and Another v The Secretary of State for Justice
...at the relevant time. 5 The prosecution did not seek to uphold the conviction or seek a retrial. In giving the judgment of the CACD, [2012] EWCA Crim 1158, Hallett LJ summarised the position: "[77] In our judgment the following summary encapsulates this appeal. The case against the appella......
-
香港特別行政區 訴 梁文輝
...「裁定事實 105. 除本席表明不接納的證供外，本席裁定PW1至PW5的證供為事實。 議題2 106. 辯方呈上兩案例： R v Turnbull and others [1977] QB 224，R v Sam Hallam [2012] EWCA Crim 1158 和 HKSAR v Yan Panyue，CACC 128/2005，指所有證人的觀察證供是瞬間，殘缺不全和不可靠。 107. 本席不同意。本席考慮PW1觀察的事實： (1) PW1説事件在下午約3時05分，當時有陽光，但沒直照PW1眼睛或背光情況，他在行車[線]上見男子A正雙手舉起2號垃圾筒蓋，並擲下，PW......
1 books & journal articles
-
Miscarriages of Justice: Is the Courtroom Still Fit for Purpose?
...and the English Courts: A Century of Trial and Error’ (2008) 15 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 435, 441 24 ibid. 25 R v Sam Hallam [2012] EWCA Crim 1158 [77] 26 ‘Appeals, Reviews and Retrials’ in Liz Campbell, Andrew Ashworth and Mike Redmayne (eds), The Criminal Process (5 th edition, Oxfo......