Ullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | LORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL,LORD STEYN,LORD WALKER OF GESTINGTHORPE,BARONESS HALE OF RICHMOND,LORD CARSWELL |
| Judgment Date | 17 June 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] UKHL 26 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 17 June 2004 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
563 cases
-
Laszlo Nikolics v The City Court of Szekszard (A Judicial Authority in Hungary)
...questions arising under articles 5 and 6 of the Convention in removal cases. As Lord Bingham put it in R(Ullah) v. Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323 at para 24 " [W]here reliance is placed on article 6 it must be shown that a person… risks suffering a flagrant denial of a fair trial in th......
-
Arunas Aleksynas and Others v Minister of Justice, Republic of Lithuania and Another
...3 and extradition is clear-cut and well-established. The test is that laid down by the House of Lords in R(Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323 (this was an asylum case but the principle is the same), namely: "It is necessary to show strong grounds for believing that the person, if......
-
British Broadcasting Corporation and another v Sugar (No 2)
...Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26, [2008] AC 153 and, by reference, its earlier decision in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26, [2004] 2 AC 323. It was in Ullah that, in para 20, Lord Bingham suggested that it was the duty of the House to keep pace with the evolvin......
-
Enreach UK Ltd v Inreach Group Ltd
...any … judgment, decision, declaration or advisory opinion of the European Court of Human Rights”. In R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323 per Lord Bingham at page 350 explained the import of this: “In determining the present question, the House is required by section 2(1) of the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
European Arrest Warrant
...as the warrant was silent about appellant's relevant conduct in that country.21 Footnotes (2006) 36 EHRR 587. [2009] EWHC 231 (Admin). [2004] UKHL 26. Other 2009 cases on article 3 are Danut Atilla Pieknyi v The Hunedoara County Court, Romania [2009] EWHC 1056 (Admin); Kolanowski v Circuit ......
28 books & journal articles
-
A COMMON LAW TORT OF PRIVACY?
...Reid, “Rebalancing Privacy and Freedom of Expression” (2012) 16 Edin L Rev 253. 106R (on the application of Ullah) v Special Adjudicator[2004] UKHL 26; [2004] 2 AC 323 at [20], stating the so-called “mirror principle”. 107 See R (on the application of Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice[2014]......
-
Absent Witnesses and the UK Supreme Court: Judicial Deference as Judicial Dialogue?
...for theEnvironment, Transport and the Regions [2001] UKHL 23, [2003] 2 AC 295; and R (on the application ofUllah) vSpecial Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26, [2004] 2 AC 323.24 N. Krisch, ‘The Open Architecture of European Human Rights Law’ (2008) 71 MLR 183.25 Ibid. at 202–6.26 Law Commission, Ev......
-
Horizontal Effect and the Constitutional Constraint
...rightagainst the state – not other individuals – should it fail to do so.Thus, the duty of24 See eg R (Ullah) vSpecial Adjudicator [2004] UKHL 26, [2004] 2AC 323 at [20] (Lord Bingham).25 See D. J. Harris, M. O’Boyle, E. Bates and C. Buckley,Har ris, O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of theEuropean......
-
CRIMINAL JUSTICE UNDER THE UNITED KINGDOM HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
...Secretary[2003] 1 AC 837 at [18]; Anderson v Secretary of State for the Home Department[2003] 1 AC 837 at [65]–[66] and [88]–[93]. 24[2004] 2 AC 323 at [20]; see also Lord Hope in N v Secretary of State for the Home Department[2005] 2 AC 296 at [24] and R Clayton & H Tomlinson, The Law of H......
Request a trial to view additional results