R v Wayte

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMR. JUSTICE BELDAM,LORD JUSTICE KERR
Judgment Date22 March 1982
Judgment citation (vLex)[1982] EWCA Crim J0322-4
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Docket NumberNo. 957/C2/80
Date22 March 1982

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases
  • Public Prosecution Service v Liam Duddy
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland)
    • 14 Marzo 2008
    ... ... 11 [28] In Wayte [1983] 76 Cr App R 110, the Court of Appeal in England held that photostat copies of documents are admissible in evidence where they are relevant and the originals have been lost. It had been argued that photocopies were secondary evidence and as there was no satisfactory explanation as to why the ... ...
  • Development Options Ltd v General Business Services Ltd
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 10 Junio 2011
    ...evidence rule, most particularly on its application to lost documents. The court took into consideration the cases cited above, as well as R v Wayte (1983) 76 Cr. App. R. 110, judgment of Bedlam J. In Wayte, it was the opinion of the court that the best evidence rule should now be confined ......
  • R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Osman
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 30 Marzo 1988
    ... ... Reg. v. Turner [ 1974 ] A.C. 357 ; [ 1973 ] 3 W.L.R. 352 ; [ 1973 ] 3 All E.R. 124 , H.L.(E.) ... Reg. v. United States Government, Ex parte Blair, The Times, 21 June 1985 ... Reg. v. Walters [ 1979 ] R.T.R. 220 ... Reg. v. Wayte ( 1982 ) 76 Cr.App.R. 110 , C.A ... Reg. v. Wille ( 1987 ) 86 Cr.App.R. 296 , C.A ... Reynolds v. Comr, of Police of the Metropolis [ 1985 ] Q.B. 881 ; [ 1985 ] 2 W.L.R. 93 ; [ 1984 ] 3 All E.R. 694 , C.A ... Savings & Investment Bank Ltd. v. Gasco ... ...
  • R v Webley (Herald)
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 7 Diciembre 2006
    ... ... Nowadays we do not confine ourselves to the best evidence. We admit all relevant evidence. The goodness or badness of it goes only to weight, and not to admissibility." ... 16 Counsel for the Crown also relied on the case of William Guy Alexander Wayte (1982) 76 C.A.R. 110. In that case the Court ruled that where crucial original documents could not be produced, photocopies thereof were admissible. The court cited with approval the approach set out by Lord Denning M.R. (supra) and ruled that "the fact that the documents were merely copies ... ...
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT