R v Wilmot

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE GLIDEWELL
Judgment Date04 November 1988
Judgment citation (vLex)[1988] EWCA Crim J1104-10
Docket NumberNo. 6381/A3/87
Date04 November 1988
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • R v Z
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 22 June 2000
    ...the evidence of the four complainants came within the ambit of the similar facts rule and he cited the judgment of Glidewell L.J. in Reg.. v. Wilmot (1989) 89 Cr. App.R. 341, 345: "It has been suggested sometimes that such evidence can never be admissible in relation to the defence of conse......
  • R v Lisa Joy Loizou
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 14 July 2006
    ... ... 41 Mr Levett referred us to Wilmot (1989) 89 Cr. App. R. 341 , at 352 (a pre-section 34 case) where Glidewell LJ said: "In the course of his submission to us, Mr. Boal told us that when he was pressing the defendant in cross-examination as to whether the account he had given was recently fabricated, he asked the ... ...
  • R v Seaton (Oral)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 13 August 2010
    ...evidence. It is that comment which Mr Carey-Hughes contends was impermissible, and which forms the basis of his appeal to this court. R v Wilmot (1989) 89 Cr App R 341 16 This question arose unexpectedly. The only authority to which the judge was referred was Archbold and in particular to......
  • R v Cannan
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Female Rape—An Ongoing Concern: Strategies for Improving Reporting and Conviction Levels
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 71-1, February 2007
    • 1 February 2007
    ...character unrelated to the current85 [1975] AC 421 at 456, per Lord Cross.86 [1975] AC 421.87 R v Butler (1986) 84 Cr App R 12, CA.88 (1988) 89 Cr App R 341, CA.89 [1991] 3 All ER 337.90 Ibid. at 348.91 Ibid.Female Rape—an Ongoing charge. However, there were exceptions to this general rule ......