Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeAndrew Lenon
Judgment Date22 May 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] EWHC 1327 (Ch)
Date22 May 2020
Docket NumberCase No. HC-2016-002798
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 May 2023
    ...QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court and to whom I will refer as “the deputy judge”), by a judgment dated 22 May 2020 ( [2020] EWHC 1327 (Ch)), the deputy judge upheld RAKIA's claims against Mr Azima in deceit and conspiracy, finding that he had acted fraudulently and dishonestl......
  • Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 March 2021
    ...AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES Mr Andrew Lenon QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) Business List (ChD), [2020] EWHC 1327 (Ch) and [2020] EWHC 1686 (Ch) Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down remotely by circul......
  • Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 1 November 2022
    ...misrepresentation and conspiracy. He rejected Mr Azima's hacking defence and dismissed the counterclaim. His judgment is reported at [2020] EWHC 1327 (Ch) (the First 5 Mr Azima was granted permission to appeal by Arnold LJ on certain terms as to payment in of the judgment sum. The Court of......
  • Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 27 May 2022
    ...and against Mr Azima on his hacking claim. The learned deputy judge therefore dismissed the counterclaim. The judgment is at [2020] EWHC 1327 (Ch). 4 The Court of Appeal dismissed Mr Azima's appeal against RAKIA's claims but, based on new evidence in relation to the hacking claim, allowed ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT