Ray v Sekhri

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMainville J.A.,NoëL J.A.,Pelletier J.A.,Lord Justice McFarlane,Lord Justice Vos,Lord Justice Rimer
Judgment Date14 February 2014
Neutral Citation[2014] EWCA Civ 119
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Docket NumberCase No: B6/2013/2254;2254 (A); 2254 (B),A-493-11
Date14 February 2014

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Wrottesley v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • 23 November 2015
    ...by the appeal courts in recent years: see Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Henwood UNK[2008] EWCA Civ 577, Ray v Sekhiri UNK[2014] EWCA Civ 119 and Gaines-Cooper v R & C Commrs UNK[2008] EWCA Civ 1502. The fact that it manifests itself as a domicile of origin claim as far as the appellant ......
  • The Right Honourable Clifton Hugh Lancelot De Verdon Baron Wrottesley v The Commissioners for Majesty's Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • 23 November 2015
    ...been considered by the appeal courts in recent years: see Barlow Clowes International v Henwood [2008] EWCA Civ 577, Ray v Sekhiri [2014] EWCA Civ 119 and GainesCooper v HMRC [2008] EWCA Civ 1502. The fact that it manifests itself as a domicile of origin claim as far as the appellant is con......
  • The Right Honourable Clifton Hugh Lancelot De Verdon Baron Wrottesley v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • 23 November 2015
    ...been considered by the appeal courts in recent years: see Barlow Clowes International v Henwood [2008] EWCA Civ 577, Ray v Sekhiri [2014] EWCA Civ 119 and GainesCooper v HMRC [2008] EWCA Civ 1502. The fact that it manifests itself as a domicile of origin claim as far as the appellant is con......
  • Z 對 P
    • Hong Kong
    • Family Court (Hong Kong)
    • 10 May 2019
    ...(9) 他解釋在回答有關他在大陸有否家庭的問題上表現得模棱兩可,這是由於問題同時包括他有否女朋友和小孩,使問題變得複雜所致。 (10) 丈夫最後提及一個英國案例Serhri v. Ray (2014) EWCA Civ 119,但他並沒有提供案例的副本。 討論 9. 首先,本席需要在這裏指出,本次聆訊並不是離婚呈請審訊的延續。換句話說,除非有特別理由,本席不會考慮和接受新的證據,否則案件便會沒完沒了。 10....

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT