Re Coghlan (Deceased)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1964 |
| Date | 01 January 1964 |
In re Coghlan
Motherway
and
Coghlan and Another
(S.C.)
Condition as to marriage and residence - Whether condition severable - Whether condition void for uncertainty.
By his will T.C. gave his farm, dwelling, stock and contents upon trust for his nephew provided his nephew should marry (if not married at his death) and come to reside there within one year from the date of his death and in the event of his nephew not marrying and coming to live there in trust to sell the farm, house,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Martyn James v Lorraine Anne Scudamore
...forward by the defendants' solicitors in a letter of 11 September 1945, Willmer J dismissed the action as frivolous and vexatious ( [1948] 1 All ER 367). The plaintiff appealed. By the time of the appeal, it also appeared that there remained a small piece of land containing a family vault (......
-
Paul John McElroy v Lynne McElroy (in her capacity as administrator of the estate of Ray James McElroy and in her personal capacity)
...made an application under the inherent jurisdiction of the court to dismiss the action as frivolous and vexatious. Willmer J [at [1948] 1 All ER 367] dismissed the proceedings. In doing so he held that: “It seems to me that a [claimant], who lies by for 23 years after the will which he clai......
- Re Coghlan (Deceased)