Contracts Law in UK Law
Ventura Capital GP Ltd (Acting for and on behalf of Ventura Capital LP Fund IV) v DnaNudge Ltd
Variation of class rights. Special rights. Preferred shares. Ordinary shareholders“
In my judgment, the only way to give business efficacy, and integrity, to the articles as a whole is to construe article 9.2 (a) as being subject to the comprehensive protection of special class rights contained in article 10.1, which must also be complied with in order to effect any abrogation of the special rights attached to the preferred shares.
Considering the relationship between the two articles, the inconsistency between them, and the absurdity of treating article 9.2 (a) as a stand-alone provision, unaffected by article 10.1, I accept Mr Collingwood's submission that something has clearly gone wrong with the drafting because the two articles do not work together.
Read literally and in isolation, the wording of article 9.2 (a) is clear and unambiguous: the preferred shares automatically convert into ordinary shares upon notice in writing from an ‘Investor Majority’. This is not a case where a provision in a contract is unclear because a word has two different meanings. Nor is this a case where the language of the articles, either read on their own, or, at any rate, when read in context, could be seen to give rise to possible rival interpretations.
For the reasons I have given, I am satisfied that the conversion of the preferred shares into ordinary shares constitutes either a ‘variation’ or an ‘abrogation’ of the special rights attached to those shares.
On that basis, there is a clear tension between articles 9.2 (a) and 10.1 so it becomes apparent, on examination, that the drafter cannot have meant clause 9.2 (a) to be read literally as it makes no rational sense, when construed in light of the protection afforded to the special rights of the preferred shareholders by article 10.1.
I also agree with Mr Collingwood that the court's finding that there is a variation, or abrogation, of the special rights attached to the preferred shares involves no inconsistency with the conclusion reached by Buckley J in Re Saltdean Estate Co Ltd, as later approved and applied by the House of Lords in the House of Fraser case and later applied by Patten J in Re Hunting Plc.
A & v Building Solutions Ltd v J & B Hopkins Ltd
Interim payment application. Interpreting a contract. Adjudicator's decision. Valuation date“
The proper approach to parallel proceedings was outlined by O'Farrell J in Structure Consulting Limited v Maroush Food Production Limited  EWHC 962 (TCC). The judge should usually give judgment on the claim based on the adjudicator's decision and then – to the extent possible – endeavour to sort out the Part 8 proceedings.
- Contracts (Applicable Law) Act 1990
- Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943
- The Public Contracts Regulations 2015
The Solvency 2 Regulations 2015
... ... to risks which are material in relation to the risks inherent in the insurance business to which the matching adjustment is applied;(g) the contracts underlying the portfolio of insurance or reinsurance obligations do not give rise to future premium payments;(h) the only underwriting risks ... ...
Standard Form Contracts as Transnational Law: Evidence from the Derivatives Markets
This paper uses new research into the derivatives markets to develop our understanding of standard form contracts as transnational law and to show how transnational law theory may be usefully infor...
- The Conclusion of State Contracts under German Law
Does a Choice of Law Bind a Claimant in a Direct Action? An Analysis in Relation to Insurance Contracts in a Maritime Law Context
This article examines the application of European Union rules on a choice of law in relation to direct action claims, with a focus on insurance contracts in a maritime setting. This is an important...
- Force Majeure in Post COVID-19: The Implication for Future Energy Law Contracts
TRANSACTIONAL: Choice of law in international contracts: An English law primer
With the increasing globalization of business, companies are regularly faced with choosing governing law for cross-border construction contracts. Invariably, for private international law, English ...
Status of cryptoassets and smart contracts under English law
On 18 November 2019, the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce published an authoritative statement on the legal status of cryptoassets and smart contracts under English law. This is a leading development for ...
UK Law Commission Announces Projects on Accommodating Smart Contracts and Digital Assets into English Law
The U.K. Law Commission has announced two new projects designed to ensure that English law is able to accommodate smart contracts and digital assets.
- Ukraine Crisis - Implications For English Law Contracts