Tolga Yaman and Another v The Crown
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Hooper |
| Judgment Date | 18 May 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] EWCA Crim 1075 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | Case No: 201106402C3 & 201106407C3 |
| Date | 18 May 2012 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Simon Taj v The Crown
...in fact commensurate with the (mistakenly) perceived risk remains for assessment by the jury: see, for example, the decision in Yaman [2012] EWCA Crim 1075. 44 Turning to the effect of intoxication, the law, replicated and confirmed in s. 76(5) of the 2008 Act in relation to self defence, h......
-
R (Duggan) v North London Assistant Deputy Coroner
...imminent threat is not required in every case where the defendant relies on self-defence. It is clear, for example, that in R v Yaman [2012] EWCA Crim 1075, which was one of the cases to which Mr Southey referred and in which the issue was whether proper directions had been given to the ju......
-
Seun Oye v The Crown
...with the (mistakenly) perceived risk still remains for assessment by the jury: see, by way of example, the decision in Yaman [2012] EWCA Crim 1075. 41 This subjective element as to mistake of fact is now confirmed by the provisions of s.76 of the 2008 Act. That reads (in its form as applica......
-
Preston v The Crown Prosecution Service
...the law of self defence need be the subject of directions where such a direction did not fall to be considered. (See also Yaman v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1075 where there was a complete failure to direct the jury in relation to the provisions of section 76(7)(b). Notwithstanding the failure to d......