Vane v Yiannopoullos
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Reid,Lord Evershed,Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest,Lord Hodson,Lord Donovan |
| Judgment Date | 19 November 1964 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1964] UKHL J1119-3 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
St Regis Paper Company Ltd v The Crown
...The principle that liability can be imposed by virtue of delegating responsibility for undertaking statutory duties was doubted in Vane v Iannopoulos [1965] AC 486. But despite the advocacy of Mr Crowther, it is unlikely to be extended, as the author of Smith & Hogan suggests. It certainly ......
- John Charles v Llewellyn Skeete Supernumerary Constable
- Odyssey Re (London) Ltd and Another (Claimants/Appellants) v Oic Run-off Ltd (Formerly Orion Insurance Company Plc)
-
Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass
...by an individual is another matter. It has been recognised in licensing cases but that is in my view anomalous (see Vane v. Yanopoulus [1965] A.C. 486). 30The latest important authority is Series v. Poole [1969] 1 Q.B. 676. That was an appeal against the dismissal of an information that t......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court
...case was whether the manager was empowered to delegate, andwhether he had delegated his powers as licensee. In Vane v Yiannopoulos[1965] AC 486, it was stated in the House of Lords that the licensee'sresponsibility for acts done in his absence without his knowledge isanomalous. In that case......
-
In the Scottish Courts
...Courtsmay adoptthesame attitude to vicarious responsibility inoffences requiring "knowledge" as is implied in Vane v.Yiannopoulos [1964] 3 W.L.R. 1218, Supra, 112).Theaccused in Thornley was a licensee who was con-victed of knowingly allowing a person under 18 to drink on hispremises, the d......