Wm. Brandt's Sons and Company v Dunlop Rubber Company, Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 03 August 1905 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1905] UKHL J0803-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 03 August 1905 |
Wm. Brandt's Sons and Company
and
Dunlop Rubber Company, Limited.
[1905] UKHL J0803-1
House of Lords
1
After hearing Counsel, as well on Thursday the 6th, as Friday the 7th, days of April last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Wm. Brandt's Sons & Co., of 4 Fenchurch Avenue, in the City of London, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 29th of January 1904, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
112 cases
- Malaysian Airlines System Bhd; Malaysian International Merchant Bankers Bhd
-
Annie F Conlan and Thomas F. Coyle v Carlow County Council and James O'Neill and William M. Byrne
...J. G. T. (1) Before Gibson and Boyd, JJ. (1) 3 Q. B. D. 569. (2) 25 Times L. R. 190. (3) [1910] 2 K. B. 630. (4) Ibid., 636. (1) [1905] A. C. 454. (2) [1904] 2 Ch. (3) 39 I. L. T. R. 80. (4) 3 Q. B. D. 569. (5) [1898] 1 Q. B. 765. (6) [1902] 1 K. B. 10. (7) [1902] 2 K. B. 190. (1) [1899] 2 ......
-
New Falmouth Resorts Ltd v International Hotels Jamaica Ltd
...affect the process of equitable assignment in any way, since, as Lord Macnaghten observed in Brandt's Sons & Co v Dunlop Rubber Company [1905] AC 454, 461, ‘The statute does not forbid or destroy equitable assignments or impair their efficacy in the slightest degree’. 54No particular form o......
-
Richard Sandor Frischmann v Vaxeal Holdings SA
...The Law of Assignment (3rd ed.) [11.173–11.179]. In both cases the authors refer to the judgment of Lord Macnaghten in Willam Brandt's Sons v Dunlop Rubber [1905] AC 454 where he said that “[t]he statute does not forbid or destroy equitable assignments or impair their efficacy in the slight......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Assignment Of Choses In Action
...[accessed on 14th December 2023]. 26 See, William Brandt's Sons & Co v Dunlop Rubber Co Ltd [1905] AC 454. 27 If it is incomplete, consideration may be required. Consideration will also be required where the assignment concerns some future chose as the agreement in such instance can only be......
-
Litigation Funding In British Virgin Islands Liquidations: Practical Guidance For Liquidators
...is permissible. 2 There are a number of limited and rare statutory exceptions. 3 William Brandt's Sons & Co v Dunlop Rubber Tyre Co Ltd[1905] AC 454. 4 Section 5 Faryab v Smith [2000] 12 WLUK 340 at [38] The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matte......
1 books & journal articles
-
BOOK DEBT FINANCING1
...12 Q B D 511. 14. Smith v SS “Zigurds” Owners [1934] A C 309. 15. Note the important case of William Brandt Sons & Co v Dunlop Rubber Co[1905] A C 454. 16. See Part A(III)(2) below. The time when the debtor receives notice of the assignment is when the respective rights of debtor and assign......