Woodward and Others v Goulstone and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 16 July 1886 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1886] UKHL J0716-3 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 16 July 1886 |
[1886] UKHL J0716-3
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel, as well on Thursday the 24th, as Friday the 25th, and Tuesday the 29th days of June last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Edward Francis Woodward, of Southwell Street, Kingsdown, in the city and county of Bristol, Builder and Contractor; Eliza Peters, of 3, Oldbury Villas, in the Parish of Saint Michaels, in the same city; and Mary Hardwick Quick, of the same place, wife of William Henry Quick, of the said city of Bristol, Photographer, praying, That the matter of the Orders set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 4th of July 1885, and also an Order of the said Court of Appeal, of the 11th of August 1885, so far as therein stated to be appealed against, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Orders, so far as aforesaid, might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
- Re Wipperman, decd. Wissler v Wipperman
-
Myers v DPP
...have been established and exist, and we have to see whether this case comes within any one of those." 9 In Woodward v. Goulstone 11 App. Cas. 469 the question was whether a lost will was set up by parole evidence. There this House considered views expressed in the Court of Appeal in Sugden ......
- Mccauley v Mccauley
- Barkwell v Barkwell