Dominant Position in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • Edgar v Edgar
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 July 1980

    Important too is the general proposition that, formal agreements, properly and fairly arrived at with competent legal advice, should not be displaced unless there are good and substantial grounds for concluding that an injustice will be done by holding the parties to the terms of their agreement.

  • Re T (an Adult) (Consent to Medical Treatment)
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 July 1992

    In this case Miss T. had been during her childhood subjected to the religious beliefs of her mother and in her weakened medical condition, in pain, and under the influence of the drugs administered to assist her, the pressure from her mother was likely to have a considerably enhanced effect.

  • Intel Corporation v Via Technologies Inc. and anp
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 June 2002

    Second, it is said that the refusal to grant a patent licence to VIA either at all or on lawful and/or reasonable terms is an abuse of a dominant position contrary to Article 82 and/or section 18, and Intel is not entitled to the relief sought by it in these proceedings.

  • Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Company Ltd and Another Unwired Planet LLC (Tenth Party)
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • 05 April 2017

    Standing back, the question I have to decide is whether Unwired Planet is in a dominant position in the relevant market. The relevant market is a market for licences under the SEPs. It is a market in which the SEP owner has 100% market share. The market is covered by the FRAND undertaking which does weaken the SEP owner's position. It is a market in which licensees can engage in holding out and there is some evidence that they do, particularly given the relative weakness of Unwired Planet.

  • Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino
    • Supreme Court
    • 20 October 2010

    Even if the agreement does not have contractual force, those factors will negate any effect the agreement might otherwise have. But unconscionable conduct such as undue pressure (falling short of duress) will also be likely to eliminate the weight to be attached to the agreement, and other unworthy conduct, such as exploitation of a dominant position to secure an unfair advantage, would reduce or eliminate it.

  • BHB Enterprises Plc v Victor Chandler (International) Ltd
    • Chancery Division
    • 27 May 2005

    It is important to notice that it is the imposition of unfair prices, not high prices, which can constitute an abuse. All that is said is that the rates are fixed at 10% of the bookmaker's gross profit or 1.5% of the bookmaker's turnover, that the cost of preparing the Pre-Race Data is approximately £4 million per year and that BHB's total income from data licensing was stated in 2002 to be expected to amount to £600 million over 5 years, that is to say, about £120 million each year.

  • Camm v Camm
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 07 December 1982

    The unfortunate fact in this case was that the hearing below was occupied to a considerable extent in questioning the wife's solicitor, who is himself the defendant in a pending action for negligence which may or may not be proceeded with. That is to say, it is not necessarily negligent advice to take a course or permit a client to take a course which a more experienced, or a stronger minded legal adviser would have discouraged.

See all results
Legislation
  • The Competition (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 2019
    ... ... into an agreement, decision, concerted practice or abuse of a dominant position under Regulation 1/2003 in accordance with article 92 of the EU ... ...
  • Competition Act 1998
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 1998
    ... ... 41An Act to make provision about competition and the abuse of a dominant position in the market; to confer powers in relation to investigations ... ...
  • The Railways (Access, Management and Licensing of Railway Undertakings) Regulations 2016
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 2016
    ... ... 2012 establishing a single European railway area (recast) ;“dominant body or firm” means a body or firm which is active and holds a dominant position in the national railway transport services market in which the relevant ... ...
  • Scotland Act 1998
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 1998
    ... ... rights ... ,(e) it would remove the Lord Advocate from his position as head of the systems of criminal prosecution and investigation of deaths ... Regulation of anti-competitive practices and agreements; abuse of dominant position; monopolies and mergers.ExceptionRegulation of particular ... ...
See all results
Books & Journal Articles
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT