Jury Trial in UK Law
-
R v Mirza; R v Connor and Rollock
... ... raise the question whether evidence about the deliberations of a jury, which reveal a lack of impartiality on the part of the jury, is always ... In only 1% of criminal cases is there a trial by a judge and jury. In all other cases there is no jury and the law is, ... ...
-
Ward v James
... ... Justice Roskill affirmed the Master's order and ordered trial by jury of this action, which is arising out of a road accident in Germany ... ...
-
Broome v Cassell & Company Ltd
... ... sum of £21,470·30 being the First Respondent's taxed Costs of the trial of the action before the Honourable Mr. Justice Lawton also be paid out of ... and a jury. In the result, on the 17th February, 1970, the jury found a verdict for ... ...
-
Connelly v DPP
... ... Refusal to allow a new trial has always been put on the ground of fairness to the accused and I cannot ... The submission was put by learned Counsel to the jury in the following words:— "—nevertheless, members of the ... ...
-
R v Jones
... ... , is this: "Can the Crown Court conduct a trial in the absence, from its commencement, of the defendant?" ... any material of assistance to the defendants would be put before the jury. The trial accordingly proceeded and the judge in his summing up warned ... ...
-
R v Abdroikov
... ... In the first two cases the trial jury included among its members a serving police officer, and in the third ... ...
-
Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd
... ... 4 The action was tried by French J. and a jury between 14 October and 19 November 1996. The issues at the trial were: the ... ...
-
Rookes v Barnard
... ... Division of the High Court of Justice with a Direction that a new trial be had on the question of damages only: And it is further Ordered , That ... to act as they did. The action was tried by Sachs J. with a jury, and the Appellant was awarded £7,500 damages. The Court of Appeal held ... ...
-
R v Sang (on Appeal from HM Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))
... ... appellant was indicted at the Old Bailey before Judge Buzzard and a jury for conspiracy to utter counterfeit American bank notes. On his ... He submitted that if the judge were satisfied at a "trial within a trial" that the offence was instigated by an agent provocateur ... ...
-
R v Coutts (Graham James)
... ... Evidence was adduced at the trial which would have enabled a rational jury, if they accepted it, to convict ... ...
See all results