Bradford Corporation v Pickles
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 29 July 1895 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1895] UKHL J0729-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 29 July 1895 |
[1895] UKHL J0729-1
House of Lords
Bradford Corporation
and
Pickles.
1
After hearing Counsel for the Appellants on Thursday the 9th day of May last, upon the Petition and Appeal of the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of the Borough of Bradford, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 10th of December 1894, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, and that the Petitioners might have the relief prayed for in the Appeal, or such other relief in the premises as to...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
64 cases
-
C.M. Callow Inc. v. Zollinger, 2020 SCC 45
...v. Hydro‑Québec, 2018 SCC 46, [2018] 3 S.C.R. 101; Houle v. Canadian National Bank, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 122; Mayor of Bradford v. Pickles, [1895] A.C. 587; Allen v. Flood, [1898] A.C. 1; United Roasters, Inc. v. Colgate‑Palmolive Co., 649 F.2d 985 (4th Cir. 1981); IFP Technologies (Canada) Inc.......
-
Three Rivers District Council et al. v. Bank of England, (2000) 257 N.R. 1 (HL)
...Northern Territory v. Mengel (1995), 69 A.J.L.R. 527 (Aust. H.C.), refd to. [paras. 10, 17, 100, 115, 153]. Bradford Corp. v. Pickles, [1895] A.C. 587, refd to. [para. Allen v. Flood, [1898] A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 10]. Jones v. Swansea City Council, [1990] 1 W.L.R. 54 (C.A.), revd. [1990] ......
-
R v Queen's County Justices
...(11) 22 Q. B. D. 345. (12) 22 L. R. Ir. 503, note. (1) [1900] A. C. at pp. 334, 335. (2) [1902] A. C. 552. (3) L. R. 9 Q. B. 17. (4) [1895] A. C. 587. (5) L. R. 2 H. L. (Sc. & Div.) (6) 7 Q. B. 232. [p. 359 (1) 7 Q. B. 555. (2) 7 A. E. 807. (3) 1 Q. B. 66. (4) 8 East, 113. (5) [1894] 2 I. R......
-
Kennedy v The Law Society
...CLR 145 NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA V MENGEL 1995 185 CLR 307 WINFIELD & JOLOWICZ ON TORT 15ED 1998 55 BRADFORD CORPORATION V PICKLES 1895 AC 587 ALLEN V FLOOD 1898 AC 1 JONES V SWANSEA CC 1989 3 AER 162 R V BOWDEN 1995 4 AER 505 KING V LA LAVIA 1999 3 IR 413 DUFF V MIN AGRICULTURE 199......
Get Started for Free
24 books & journal articles
-
Misfeasance in public office: a very peculiar tort.
...Campbell CJ, Wightman, Erle and Crompton LJJ). (46) Ashby (1703) 1 Smith LC (13th ed) 253, 283. (47) Cf Bradford Corporation v Pickles [1895] AC 587, 601, where Lord Macnaghten could see no malice in Mr Pickles' conduct, even if it was 'churlish, selfish and grasping', or morally 'shocking'......
-
Table of cases
...42, 51, 82 Marine Services International Ltd v Ryan Estate, 2013 SCC 44 .........56, 344, 349 Mayor of Bradford v Pickles, [1895] AC 587, [1895] UKHL 1 ....................357, 375 Metalclad Corp v United Mexican States (2000), 119 ILR 615 (NAFTA Arbitral Tribunal) ...............................
-
Table of Cases
...4 W.W.R. 242, 53 Man. R. (2d) 81 (Q.B.) ..................................................... 239 Bradford Corporation v. Pickles, [1895] A.C. 587, 73 L.T. 353 (H.L.) ............... 387 The Law of TorTs 472 Bradford v. Kanellos (1973), [1974] S.C.R. 409, 40 D.L.R. (3d) 578 .............. 1......
-
Table of cases
...& Deans, [1988] 4 W.W.R. 242, 53 Man. R. (2d) 81 (Q.B.) ......................................... 250 Bradford Corporation v. Pickles, [1895] A.C. 587, 73 L.T. 353 (H.L.) ............... 407 Bradford v. Kanellos (1973), [1974] S.C.R. 409, 40 D.L.R. (3d) 578 .......................................
Get Started for Free