British Glanzstoff Manufacturing Company, Ltd v General Accident, Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date28 October 1912
Judgment citation (vLex)[1912] UKHL J1028-1
CourtHouse of Lords
Date28 October 1912

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Triple Point Technology, Inc. v PTT Public Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 16 Julio 2021
    ...of Lords. As Sir Rupert Jackson explains, the judgment of the House of Lords is more fully reported in the Reports of the Sessions Cases: 1913 SC (HL) 1. Viscount Haldane LC gave the leading judgment. He characterised clause 26 as “an enclave in the contract by itself providing for a specia......
  • Re Sanpete Builders (S) Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 5 Enero 1989
    ...to liquidated damages after termination.In British Glanzstoff Manufacturing Co Ltd v General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp Ltd [1913] AC 143 the House of Lords held that a clause on liquidated damages applied only where the contractors had completed the contract and did not apply wher......
  • LW Infrastructure PTE Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors PTE Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • Invalid date
  • LW Infrastructure Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 5 Julio 2011
    ...and Shipping Ltd [1989] AC 1056 (folld) British Glanzstoff Manufacturing Co Ltd v General Accident, Fire and Life Assurance Corp Ltd [1913] AC 143 (distd) British Glanzstoff Manufacturing Co Ltd, The v The General Accident, Fire, and Life Assurance Corp Ltd [1912] SC 591 (distd) Engineering......
  • Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries