Campbell v MGN Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeTHE LORD NICHOLLS OF BIRKENHEAD,LORD HOFFMANN,LORD HOPE OF CRAIGHEAD,THE BARONESS HALE OF RICHMOND,LORD CARSWELL
Judgment Date06 May 2004
Neutral Citation[2004] UKHL 22
CourtHouse of Lords
Date06 May 2004
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
427 cases
  • Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP v Reuters Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 July 2017
    ...economic information, and also information which corrects a false impression or image. Mr Vassall-Adams referred in that connection to Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457. In that case the claimant, an internationally famous fashion model, who had courted publicity, volunte......
  • Rashid Maqsood Abbasi v Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 March 2023
    ...10 rights of the press in the context of the principle of open justice. At [17] he distilled the four propositions which emerged from Campbell v. MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22; [2004] 2 AC 457: “First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. Secondly, where the values under the tw......
  • HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 December 2021
    ...the claimant and in favour of the defendant and its readers”. 49 The judge then cited Lord Hoffmann at [57] in Campbell v. MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 ( Campbell), where he said that: “[a] person may attract or even seek publicity about some aspects of his or her life without creating any publi......
  • Aaa v Associated Newspapers Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 25 July 2012
    ...as an informational tort in that it protects "the right to control the dissemination of information about one's private life", Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 [51]. The aspects of the claimant's privacy rights which, it is said, are engaged are the following: i) the child's interests in ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 firm's commentaries
  • Privilege, And This Time We Mean It
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 17 May 2007
    ...stories of immense public interest that previously would not have seen the light of day. Footnotes 1 [2006] UKHL 44 2 [2001] 2 AC 127 3 [2004] UKHL 22; [2004] 2 AC 457 4 See, in particular, Cream Holdings v Banerjee [2004] UKHL 44; [2005] 1 AC 253 5 In re S (A Child) [2004] UKHL 47; [2005] ......
  • Trade Secrets Directive Has Not Changed Substantive English Law Principles Protecting Confidential Information
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 24 April 2020
    ...of the owner (Coco v A. N. Clark [1969] RPC 41, Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109, Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 [2004] 2 AC 457). This is the equitable obligation of As between a company and its employees and other workers, in addition to the equitable oblig......
  • Scope for damages for data protection violations in the UK widened by the Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 28 April 2015
    ...[2003] QB 195. 4) Article 8 ensuring the right to privacy; Article 10 ensuring the right to freedom of expression. 5) Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457. 6) OBG Limited and others v Allan and others; Douglas and another and others v Hello! Limited and others; Mainstream Properties Limited v You......
  • Whipping Up A Tort: Actions Based On Privacy
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 15 May 2007
    ...42. See for example, Lord Sedley in Douglas & ors v Hello! Ltd [2001] 2 WLR 992; [2001] 2 All ER 289 at 320. Campbell v MGN Limited [2004] UKHL 22. Lord Hope of Craighead at 125. See Lord Woolf CJ in A v B plc [2002] EWCA Civ 337, [2003] QB 195, 202 at 4: "[Articles 8 and 10] have provi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
85 books & journal articles
  • Trade Secrets' Under New Zealand Law
    • New Zealand
    • Canterbury Law Review No. 22-2016, January 2016
    • 1 January 2016
    ...RPC 33 (UKSC) at [23]: “After all, an action in breach of confidence is based ultimately on conscience”. 52 Notably, Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 (HL) at [14] (per Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead): “This cause of action has now firmly shaken off the limiting constraint of the need for an ......
  • PRE-COMMENCEMENT DISCOVERY AND THE ODEX LITIGATION: COPYRIGHT VERSUS CONFIDENTIALITY OR IS IT PRIVACY?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...v Y [1988] 2 All ER 648. 20 Recall the SARS epidemic in Singapore and the need for urgent public contact tracing. 21 Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 WLR 1232. 22 In the UK, the Human Rights Act 1998 brings into UK domestic law, the provisions of the ECHR 1950. To ensure adequate protection of t......
  • THE BASIS FOR ORIGINALITY IN PHOTOGRAPHS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...Copyright – Photograph as Art, Photograph as Database” (2012) 25 Harv JL & Tech 339 at 349. 39 Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 at 477, where Lord Hoffmann observed that “a photograph is in principle information no different from any other information”; OBG Ltd v Allan......
  • A COMMON LAW TORT OF PRIVACY?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...Clarendon Press, 1989); and Daniel J Solove, Understanding Privacy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008). 6 See Campbell v MGN Ltd[2004] UKHL 22; [2004] 2 AC 457 at [51], per Lord Hoffmann, and Hosking v Runting[2004] NZCA 34; [2005] 1 NZLR 1 at [239], per Tipping J. 7Peck v UK (44647......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT