Cheltenham and Gloucester Plc v Krausz

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE PHILLIPS,LORD JUSTICE MILLETT,LORD JUSTICE BUTLER-SLOSS
Judgment Date22 October 1996
Neutral Citation[1996] EWCA Civ J1022-1
Docket NumberCCRTI 95/1501/H
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date22 October 1996
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 December 1999
    ...should be afforded limited protection in such a case. The nature of that protection was considered by this court in Cheltenham and Gloucester Plc v Krausz [1997] 1 WLR 1558. That decision shows that the protection is limited, but it is nevertheless of considerable value to mortgagors who a......
  • Swift Advances Plc Against James Bain Martin And Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 4 September 2015
    ...south of the border, including Palk v Mortgage Services Funding plc [1993] Ch 330 at 337/41 and Cheltenham and Gloucester plc v Krausz [1997] 1 WLR 1558, both decisions of the Court of Appeal. [34] It was submitted that the sheriff and the sheriff principal placed disproportionate weight on......
  • Rathner (Liquidator), in the matter of PE Capital Nominees Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Runner Investment Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 July 2023
    ...2 Ves Sen 371; 28 ER 238 Chelsea and Waltham Green Building Society v Armstrong [1951] 1 Ch 853 Cheltenham and Gloucester plc v Krausz [1997] 1 WLR 1558 Chesterfield and Midland Silkstone Colliery Co (Ltd) v Hawkins (1865) 3 H & C 677 China and South Sea Bank Ltd v Tan Soon Gin (Alias Georg......
  • State Bank of NEW South Wales t/a COLONIAL State Bank v A CAREY Harrison III
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 March 2002
    ...whether the judge had jurisdiction to grant a stay pending the outcome of the appeal in the Lloyd's v Jaffray litigation. 63 In Cheltenham & Gloucester v Krausz [1997] 1 WLR 1158 Phillips LJ (as he then was) said this (at page 1567) "In my judgment the very specific delimitation of the powe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT