Property and Conveyancing in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • Oxley v Hiscock
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 06 May 2004

    It must now be accepted that (at least in this Court and below) the answer is that each is entitled to that share which the court considers fair having regard to the whole course of dealing between them in relation to the property. includes the arrangements which they make from time to time in order to meet the outgoings (for example, mortgage contributions, council tax and utilities, repairs, insurance and housekeeping) which have to be met if they are to live in the property as their home.

  • Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan and Others
    • House of Lords
    • 24 Jun 1940

    A balance has to be maintained between the right of the occupier to do what he likes with his own, and the right of his neighbour not to be interfered with. It is impossible to give any precise or universal formula, but it may broadly be said that a useful test is perhaps what is reasonable according to the ordinary usages of mankind living in society, or more correctly in a particular society.

  • Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset and Others
    • House of Lords
    • 08 May 1990

    The first and fundamental question which must always be resolved is whether, independently of any inference to be drawn from the conduct of the parties in the course of sharing the house as their home and managing their joint affairs, there has at any time prior to acquisition, or exceptionally at some later date, been any agreement, arrangement or understanding reached between them that the property is to be shared beneficially.

  • Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)
    • House of Lords
    • 24 May 2006

    The parties' matrimonial home, even if this was brought into the marriage at the outset by one of the parties, usually has a central place in any marriage. So it should normally be treated as matrimonial property for this purpose. As already noted, in principle the entitlement of each party to a share of the matrimonial property is the same however long or short the marriage may have been.

  • Gissing v Gissing
    • House of Lords
    • 07 Jul 1970

    A resulting, implied or constructive trust—and it is unnecessary for present purposes to distinguish between these three classes of trust—is created by a transaction between the trustee and the cestui qui trust in connection with the acquisition by the trustee of a legal estate in land, whenever the trustee has so conducted himself that it would be inequitable to allow him to deny to the cestui qui trust a beneficial interest in the land acquired.

  • White v White
    • House of Lords
    • 26 Oct 2000

    Plainly, when present, this factor is one of the circumstances of the case. It represents a contribution made to the welfare of the family by one of the parties to the marriage. He should decide how important it is in the particular case. The nature and value of the property, and the time when and circumstances in which the property was acquired, are among the relevant matters to be considered.

  • Ayerst v C. & K. (Construction) Ltd
    • House of Lords
    • 21 May 1975

    The "legal ownership" of the trust property is in the trustee, but he holds it not for his own benefit but for the benefit of the cestui que trustent or beneficiaries. Upon the creation of a trust in the strict sense as it was developed by equity the full ownership in the trust property was split into two constituent elements, which became vested in different persons: the "legal ownership" in the trustee, what came to be called the "beneficial ownership" in the cestui que trust.

See all results
Legislation
  • Conveyancing and Law of Property Act 1892
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 1892
  • Law of Property Act 1925
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 1925
    ... . . . Law of Property Act, 1925 (15 & 16 Geo. 5.) CHAPTER 20. An Act to consolidate the enactments relating to Conveyancing and the Law of Property in England and Wales. . [9th April 1925] . . B . e. it enacted by the King's most Excellent Majesty,. by and with ......
  • Conveyancing Act 1882
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 1882
    ....... (1) 1.—(1.) This Act may be cited as the Conveyancing Act, 1882. ; . and the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act, 1881. (in this Act. referred to as the Conveyancing Act of 1881) and this Act may be. cited together as the Conveyancing Acts, 1881, 1882. . ......
  • Law of Property Act 1922
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 01, 1922
    ...... amend the law relating to commonable lands and of intestacy, and to amend the Wills Act, 1837, the Settled Land Acts, 1882 to 1890, the Conveyancing Acts, 1881 to 1911, the Trustee Act, 1893, and the Land Transfer Acts, 1875 and 1897. . [29th June 1922] . . B E it enacted by the King's most ......
See all results
Books & Journal Articles
  • Conveyancing And The Property Acts Of 1925
    • Nbr. 24-1, January 1961
    • The Modern Law Review
  • Legal challenges and opportunities of blockchain technology in the real estate sector
    • Nbr. 12-2, July 2020
    • Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law
    • 129-145
    Purpose: Blockchain, which was originally created to enable peer-to-peer digital payment systems (bitcoin), is considered to have several benefits for different sectors, such as the real estate one...
    ...... administrations andresearcherswho are working on blockchain and property conveyancing.Keywords Real estate, Land registry, Blockchain, Sharing ......
  • Cohabitants, Property and the Law: A Study of Injustice
    • Nbr. 72-1, January 2009
    • The Modern Law Review
    With cohabitation outside marriage becoming increasingly common, the law's response to the problems that arise on separation has become a key issue for public and family policy. This article draws ...
    ...... the need for reformgoes beyond the intro- duction of a discretionary regime, suchas that proposed by the Law Commission, to reformof conveyancingand property law and practice to facilitate initial, as well as post-separation private ordering. INTROD UCTION For ov er twen ty years, it h as been ......
  • REVIEWS
    • Nbr. 37-5, September 1974
    • The Modern Law Review
    Book reviewed in this article: Discretion to Disobey. By M. R. Kadish and S. H. Kadish. Fundamental Rights: A volume of essays to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of the founding of the Law Sch...
    ...... of the subject, such as adoption, guardianship and property rights. It should be said at once that Professor Bevaa ......
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT