Clover, Clayton and Company, Ltd v Hughes
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Judgment Date | 14 March 1910 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1910] UKHL J0314-1 |
| Date | 14 March 1910 |
Clover, Clayton and Company, Limited
and
Hughes.
[1910] UKHL J0314-1
House of Lords
1
After hearing Counsel, as well on Monday the 31st day of January, as on Tuesday the 1st day of February last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Clover, Clayton and Company, Limited, whose Registered Office is at Rose Brae, Birkenhead, in the County of Chester, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 22d of July 1909, might be reviewed before His...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
35 cases
- Falmouth Docks and Engineering Company Ltd v Treloar
- Partridge Jones & John Paton Ltd v James
-
R v National Insurance Commissioners, ex parte Hudson ; R v Secretary of State for Social Services
... ... Thorley [1903] A.C. 443 and Clover Clayton v. Hughes [1910] A.C. 242 ... 23 Part II of the Act of 1946 ... ...
-
Chief Adjudication Officer v Faulds
... ... v. Williamson [1908] A.C. 437 ... 10 In Clover, Clayton & Co. Ltd. v. Hughes [1910] A.C. 242 a man was tightening a nut ... which incapacitated him from his employment with the railway company. He was held to have been incapacitated by accident within the meaning of ... ...
Get Started for Free
