Crystal Mews Ltd v Metterick Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Mr Justice Lawrence Collins,MR JUSTICE LAWRENCE COLLINS |
| Judgment Date | 13 November 2006 |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] EWHC 3087 (Ch),[2006] EWHC 2653 (Ch) |
| Docket Number | Case No:1HC 302/06,Case No: 1HC302/06 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Date | 13 November 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
85 cases
-
Julie Anne Palmer and Nicholas Edward Reed (Joint Liquidators of Changtel Solutions UK Ltd ((in Liquidation))) (Applicants) JI-Chuen Jason Tsai (Respondent)
...unconditional release after serving half the sentence: Criminal Justice Act 2003 section 258. 17 In Crystalmews Limited v Metterick [2006] EWHC 3087 (Ch), Lawrence Collins J gave valuable guidance on the principles to be applied in sentencing for contempt consisting of a breach of a freezi......
-
F W Farnsworth v Lacy and Ors
...to flout the court's order is relevant to penalty. 21 As Lawrence Collins J said in Crystalmews Limited v. Metterick and Ors [2006] EWHC 3087 (Ch at [8] and [9]: "In contempt cases the object of the penalty is both to punish conduct in defiance of the court's order as well as serving a coe......
-
BG International v Umali, McPine, Sinclair & Others
...which should be borne in mind, in the judgment of Lawrence Collins J in the case of Crystal Mews Limited v Metterick & Others [2006] EWHC 3087 (Ch). At paragraph 13 of the judgment Lawrence Collins J said: "The matters which I may take into account include these. First, whether the clai......
-
Back office Ltd v Mr James Percival and Others (Defendants 1, 4, 5 and 6/Respondents)
...account in determining sanctions were those set out by Lawrence Collins J (as he then was) in Crystal Mews Ltd v Metterick and others [2006] EWHC 3087 (Ch) at paragraph 13: "The matters which I may take into account include these. First, whether the claimant has been prejudiced by virtue of......
Request a trial to view additional results