Cumbria County Council v M (1st Respondent) F (2nd Respondent) The Children (by their Children's Guardian) (3rd Respondents)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMr Justice Peter Jackson
Judgment Date30 March 2015
Neutral Citation[2015] EWHC 918 (Fam)
Date30 March 2015
CourtFamily Division
Docket NumberCase No: CA13C000119

[2015] EWHC 918 (Fam)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

FAMILY DIVISION

Before:

The Honourable Mr Justice Peter Jackson

Case No: CA13C000119

Between:
Cumbria County Council
Applicant
and
M
1st Respondent
F
2nd Respondent
The Children (by their Children's Guardian)
3rd Respondents

Jane Cross QC and Peter Rothery (instructed by Cumbria County Council) for the Applicant

Gillian Irving QC (instructed by Denby Co Solicitors) for the Mother

Karl Rowley QC and Jenny Scully (instructed by Livingstons Solicitors) for the Father

Janet Bazley QC and Carly Henley (instructed by Bendles Solicitors) for the Children's Guardian

Richard Hunt for Cumbria Constabulary

Oliver Murphy for Guardian News and Media Ltd, Associated Newpapers Ltd, The BBC, CN Group, Independent Print Ltd, The Press Association, Telegraph Media Group and Times Newspapers Ltd

Judgment date 30 March 2015

JUDGMENT: Publication of Judgment (No. 4)

Mr Justice Peter Jackson
1

A year ago, on 28 March 2014, I gave a judgment in these care proceedings. In it, I made findings of fact about the circumstances surrounding the death of Poppi Worthington in December 2012. The judgment also raised issues about the manner in which her death had been investigated for consideration by various responsible authorities.

2

There have subsequently been a number of developments. In October, the family proceedings ended with the making of orders in relation to the other children of the family. In the same month a coroner's inquest was held in circumstances that provoked criticism. Steps now have been taken to secure a fresh inquest. A Serious Case Review is also in progress. Meanwhile, a reporting restriction order has been made in these family proceedings and remains in effect. Its terms have been settled with the participation of the media and it is not suggested that the current version, dated 14 January 2015, should be disturbed. Finally, on 16 March 2015, Cumbria Constabulary announced that criminal proceedings are not to be taken against either of Poppi's parents.

3

The hearing that has taken place today was fixed last December in order to consider once again whether the fact-finding judgment should be published. The central reason why that had not so far occurred was the risk that publication might prejudice any criminal trial. The very recent conclusion of the criminal investigations removes that concern. If this were the only consideration, a decision that the judgment should now be published would have been likely.

4

However, a further unforeseen factor has now come into play. It arises from the criminal investigation itself. The police have obtained expert advice about the medical investigations into Poppi's death from three specialists. Those opinions, not available at the time of the family court hearing, differ in a number of respects from the expert advice upon which the findings of fact were based.

5

In the result, the court and all those participating at this hearing have now been notified that an application is on the point of being issued by Poppi's father, seeking a reopening of the court's findings.

6

On the question of publication of the judgment, there is division between the parties:

(i) The media, on whose behalf Ms...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Re W (Children)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 février 2016
    ...at [2014] EWHC 4486 (Fam)). 16 On 30 th March 2015 Jackson J gave a further short judgment (which was again published on Bailii at [2015] EWHC 918 (Fam)) which records the arrangements that had been made to re-hear the fact finding issue in the light of the father's application 'seeking a ......
  • F v Cumbria County Council and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 19 janvier 2016
    ...and a date was fixed for 23 April for the application to be considered. I declined to publish the 2014 judgment in the meantime: [2015] EWHC 918 (Fam)http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/ Fam/2015/918.html 31 On 23 April, I granted the father's application for a further hearing: [2015] EWFC......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT