Daryl Howard Morris v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Leveson |
| Judgment Date | 16 April 2013 |
| Neutral Citation | [2013] EWCA Crim 436 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 201203689D2 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 16 April 2013 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Moses Adler v Crown Prosecution Service
...not simply be resolved by us on that basis; see for example the recent decision of the Court of Appeal Criminal Division in R v Morris [2013] EWCA Crim 436. 12 It was, however, clear that the issue under s.3 had not been raised before the judge. Counsel for the CPS did not know why as he ha......
-
R v James Wilkinson
...As we have said, neither of those situations arose on the facts of this case. 15 The taxi fare cases of R v Aziz and R v Morris [2013] EWCA Crim 436, [2014] 1 WLR 16, on which Miss Sivakumaran relied, are both cases where the passengers had been taken to their destination and then made off......
-
R v Tracey Riddell
...of assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders." A similar conclusion, by reference to the facts of the case, was reached in Morris [2014] 1 WLR 16, [2013] EWCA Crim 436: a case where the defendant had been charged with dangerous driving. It is therefore to be noted that both cases proceed......
-
Hon Kwan 對 Kenneth And Another
...權威法律典藉Clerk & Lindsell on Torts (2014年) 第 21 版，第15-52段在論述與上述第101A(1) 條類同的英國法例時說，僅為真誠相信有人犯罪已足以令被告人倚仗該條例作為被指犯法的抗辯理由 (引用了英國判決 R v Morris [2014] 1 WLR 16,第 19 段)。而被用以作為侵權訴訟的抗辯理由時，被告人有可能需顯示其信念是真誠及合理的 17. 前第14段所述各點，充份顯示被告人的信念，是真誠及合理的。(即使 “申索陳述書” 亦提及，原告人自己亦曾以為自己或已拿取了被告人的物品 (見前第6及14(d) 段))。 18. 基於以......
Request a trial to view additional results