Decision Nº ACQ 196 2006. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 22-12-2009

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeMr Norman J Rose FRICSMr Andrew J Trott FRICS
Date22 December 2009
CourtUpper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
Judgement NumberACQ 196 2006
UPPER TRIBUNAL (LANDS CHAMBER)

UPPER TRIBUNAL (LANDS CHAMBER)


UT Neutral citation number: [2009] UKUT 126 (LC)

LT Case Number: ACQ/196-199/2006


TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007


COMPENSATION compulsory purchase land on edge of village acquired for bypass planning permission granted for residential development of retained land whether highway objection to residential development in no-scheme world whether residential planning permission would have been granted for the acquired land and the retained land in the no-scheme world whether land possessed hope value and, if so, the degree of hope cancellation assumption Spirerose considered whether compensation to be reduced to reflect betterment interim decision Land Compensation Act 1961 ss 2, 6, 9 and 14 Highways Act 1980 s 261

IN THE MATTER OF A NOTICE OF REFERENCE

BETWEEN (1) PERSIMMON HOMES (MIDLANDS) LIMITED (2) ST ALBANS DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE

(3) OLD ROAD SECURITIES PLC Claimants


and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR Acquiring TRANSPORT Authority



Re: 2.4515 ha. of land at Oakley Road Clapham Bedfordshire



Before: N J Rose FRICS and A J Trott FRICS



Sitting at Procession House, 110 New Bridge Street, London EC4V 6JL

on 15/16 and 19/23 January 2009



Robin Purchas QC and Philip Petchey, instructed by Williams & Co, solicitors of Ampthill for the Claimants

Timothy Morshead, instructed by Treasury Solicitors, for the Acquiring Authority















































The following cases are referred to in this decision:


Transport for London v Spirerose Limited (In Administration) [2009] RVR 18 (CA)

Transport for London v Spirerose Limited (in Administration) [2009] 4 All ER 810

Urban Edge Group Limited v London Underground Limited [2009] UKUT 103 (LC)

Essex County Showground Ltd v Essex County Council [2006] RVR 336 (LT)

Esso Petroleum Company Limited v Secretary of State for Transport [2008] RVR 351

Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trustees Registered v Hampshire County Council [1980] 1 EGLR 150

Leicester City Council v Leicestershire County Council [1995] 2 EGLR 169

Pointe Gourde Quarrying and Transport Company Limited v Sub-Intendent of Crown Lands [1947] AC 565 (PC)

Jelson Ltd v Blaby District Council [1977] 1 WLR 1020

Melwood Units Pty Ltd v Main Roads Commissioner [1979] AC 426

Davy v Leeds Corpn [1965] 1 WLR 445

Fletcher Estates (Harlescott) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [2000] 2 AC 307



The following cases were referred to in argument:

Margate Corporation v Devotwill Investments Limited [1970] 3 All ER 864 (HL)

Trocette Property Company Limited v GLC [1974] RVR 306 (CA)

Waters v Welsh Development Agency [2004] 1 WLR 1304 (HL)

RMC (UK) Limited v Greenwich LBC [2005] RVR 140 (LT)

Greenweb Limited v Wandsworth LBC [2008] RVR 294

Spirerose Limited (In Administration) v Transport for London [2008] RVR 12 (LT)

Transport for London v Spirerose Limited (In Administration) [2009] RVR 18 (CA)

Fletcher Estates Ltd v Secretary of State [2000] 2 AC 307

Myers v Milton Keynes Development Corporation [1974] 1 WLR 696

Director of Buildings v Shun Fung [1995] 2 AC 111

South Eastern Railway v LCC [1915] 2 Ch 252

Cooke v Secretary of State for the Environment (1974) 27 P & CR 234





INTERIM DECISION
Introduction
  1. These four references are to determine the compensation payable by the Secretary of State for Transport, the acquiring authority, for the compulsory acquisition of 2.4515 ha. (6.058 acres) of land at Oakley Road, Clapham, Bedfordshire (the reference land). The freehold interest in the reference land was sold to Persimmon Homes (Midlands) Limited (Persimmon) prior to the date of entry by the St Albans Diocesan Board of Finance (SDBF). Persimmon agreed that SDBF and Old Road Securities plc (ORS) who were granted an option to purchase the subject land in 1994 would retain the right to negotiate and receive any compensation arising from the Secretary of State for Transport’s acquisition. Four references were made to the Tribunal, one in the name of each of the parties and one in joint names. It is agreed that these references are to be dealt with together as one claim.

  2. The reference land was compulsorily acquired under the A6 Trunk Road (Clapham Bypass) Compulsory Purchase Order (No.PS10) 2000 and the A6 Trunk Road (Clapham Bypass) Supplementary Compulsory Purchase Order (No.PS11) 2000. Notices to treat were served on 17 May 2000. Entry was taken on 5 January 2001, which is the valuation date.

  3. In the light of the evidence we find the following facts. The reference land comprised an irregularly shaped parcel of land, occupying the south western corner of the Clapham Folly site, which lay on the north western side of the village of Clapham. The Folly site had an area of approximately 15 ha. It had a frontage on the east of 632 metres to the A6 Trunk Road (Milton Road) and on the south a frontage of 248 metres to Oakley Road, from which access was taken. Oakley Road was a county road, which linked Clapham to the nearby village of Oakley.

  4. The Folly site was formerly glebe land of Clapham and Biddenham, owned by SDBF. The entire western side of the reference land (195 metres) was enclosed by a substantial boundary hedgerow. On the northern and eastern sides the reference land boundaries did not follow any established physical features. They ran across an area of relatively open land, enclosed by a mix of trees, other vegetation and open land. That area comprised old gravel workings, subsequently filled with inert waste, open storage, grazing and allotments. The open storage use was unsightly. There were areas of contamination within that part of the Folly site. A public footpath crossed the Folly site, linking Clapham with the village of Oakley, one kilometre to the west. About 128 metres of the footpath ran across the reference land.

  5. The physical circumstances of the reference land were the same at the valuation date as at the date of notice to treat. These circumstances in turn were generally the same as those at 23 September 1999, when outline planning permission was granted for comprehensive development of the Folly site (including the reference land) for residential, commercial, community and open space purposes. The only difference was that the use of the land for storage, grazing and allotments had ceased by 17 March 2000.

  6. The outline planning permission included a condition, No.22, that

“There shall be no development on any land required for the A6 Clapham Bypass. In particular, there shall be no development on land identified on the Compulsory Purchase Order plan or the Supplementary Compulsory Purchase Order plan for the A6 Bypass. [The reference land]”

  1. Prior to the opening of the bypass the A6 through the village of Clapham was a single carriageway road of varying width. The built-up frontage of the village extended over a distance of some 2½ km. The provision of a bypass for Clapham had been Government policy since 1985, when it was...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT